Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 10-30-2012, 10:57 AM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,692,240 times
Reputation: 853

Advertisements

How NOT to get elected:


Fairfax, VA – Virginia Congressman Gerry Connolly (D-11) shocked constituents by suggesting that military Veterans are unqualified to serve in Congress because their deployments prevent them from putting “sweat equity” into the districts they hope to serve in Congress.

His opponent responded:

"Our country’s Veterans and career first responders don’t just have sweat equity in their community, they have blood equity in America”

- Colonel Chris Perkins (Ret)
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-30-2012, 11:47 AM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,098 posts, read 16,013,631 times
Reputation: 28265
Dude won by less than 1,000 vote in '10. He is extremely liberal, I hope he gets beat.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2012, 11:58 AM
 
5,787 posts, read 4,692,240 times
Reputation: 853
He certainly is an idiot!
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2012, 12:24 PM
 
Location: Central Maine
4,697 posts, read 6,418,939 times
Reputation: 5046
October 29, 2012 Congressman Connolly D-VA - Veterans Unqualified to Serve in Congress

From the Las Vegas TSG Business News article quoted above:

Quote:
In an October 22nd Washington Post interview, Connolly “dismisses Perkins as unqualified” for Congress, despite Colonel Perkins’ many leadership assignments that included command of a Special Forces Battalion of over six-hundred men, and numerous combat deployments.
I went to the Washington Post article

Connolly's record in Congress is more substance than flash - The Washington Post

and searched for the word "unqualified." It appears exactly one time in the article - here is exactly what appeared:

Quote:
If Connolly is worried, he isn’t showing it. He dismisses Perkins as unqualified, based on what he calls his failure since leaving the Army to become civically engaged in the 11th District.
So Connolly isn't saying, as the OP states, that veterans are unqualified to serve in Congress - as far as I can tell, this is something Connolly has NEVER said, and he certainly didn't say it in the Washington Post article upon which the Las Vegas TSG Business News article is based. And nowhere does he say that his opponent -- or anyone else -- is unqualified to serve in Congress due to his military service. Connolly is saying that his opponent is unqualified based on his not getting involved in his Congressional district since leaving the military.

That's a huge difference, but I'm sure that it will nevertheless escape many people.

Next Tuesday I get to vote for Connolly again. I'm looking forward to it.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2012, 12:39 PM
 
Location: Atlanta
6,793 posts, read 5,626,600 times
Reputation: 5660
Well, its not the first time someone has read one thing and found it to mean something totally different. SHOCKING it aint.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2012, 12:39 PM
 
687 posts, read 1,370,067 times
Reputation: 563
The "Las Vegas Trade Show Guide" is not an actual news site. It is a site for posting press releases. What you saw is a Perkins press release pretending to be a real news story. There is even a direct link to make a contribution to Perkins. Simple minds are easy to dupe.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2012, 12:48 PM
 
57,022 posts, read 34,994,462 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenGene View Post
October 29, 2012 Congressman Connolly D-VA - Veterans Unqualified to Serve in Congress

From the Las Vegas TSG Business News article quoted above:

I went to the Washington Post article

Connolly's record in Congress is more substance than flash - The Washington Post

and searched for the word "unqualified." It appears exactly one time in the article - here is exactly what appeared:

So Connolly isn't saying, as the OP states, that veterans are unqualified to serve in Congress - as far as I can tell, this is something Connolly has NEVER said, and he certainly didn't say it in the Washington Post article upon which the Las Vegas TSG Business News article is based. And nowhere does he say that his opponent -- or anyone else -- is unqualified to serve in Congress due to his military service. Connolly is saying that his opponent is unqualified based on his not getting involved in his Congressional district since leaving the military.

That's a huge difference, but I'm sure that it will nevertheless escape many people.

Next Tuesday I get to vote for Connolly again. I'm looking forward to it.
Nuance. Thanks...i figured that the OP posted a load of bull.

Moreover, i can't stand this stupid idea that retired military ar ALWAYS better qualified than everyone else is for elected office.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2012, 12:53 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 36,897,598 times
Reputation: 15037
Wow, second total thread fail in one day. Going for a new record?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-30-2012, 01:11 PM
 
12,905 posts, read 15,565,380 times
Reputation: 9392
GreenGene,

Thank you for your always wonderful, well-reasoned responses. I cannot stand these unintelligent, misinformation spewers on this board. It makes me fear for the education levels in our country.
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top