Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo
So assuming we have a severe problem...whatcha gonna do about it?
|
Reduce CO2 and Methane emissions
Quote:
Originally Posted by totsuka
Follow the money....take away their funding and see what they say.
|
Yes stop funding all betraying lobbyists who are funded from coal profits.
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo
Yes, we are supposed to ship more jobs to China and India to reduce global warming. Yes, that will work.  |
Contrary Al Gore and others suggest a trade ban on them till they stop new coal power plants, China opens one every week.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
1) Where did you get 97% of climate scientists agree on severe climate problem?
2) What is this severe climate problem?
3) Where did you get that Romney is waiting for 100%?
What a ridiculous thread using made up crap..
|
I work from outside of US and get some other facts not so much affected by US lobbyism for oil coal and gas.
Scientists offered cash to dispute climate study | Environment | The Guardian
Severe is when we cant stop it and it may be to late already. It is not a natural variation when coal is stored in millions of years, then is burned up in a short time.
Romney is not alone wishing 100% proof there are climatproblems, there are never 100% in science, by then it is to late and we are all dead.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd trick op
Yep .... and 97% of climatologists have a powerful incentive to set themselves up at the center of an environmental bureaucracy which, BTW, doesn't know how to address the supposed "crisis", but will quickly agree that it requires more stsff and a larger appropriation every year.
|
That is BS, they worked with climate before it was an issue in Nasa etc. Our governements have their own experts to evaluate what is BS or not according o their own agenda, so an oil-man like Bush was covering for his mates.
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73
It's a tough job market out there for many scientists, especially those who wish to pursue academia rather than join the real world. Exploiting money from DC is paramount to getting that "job for life".
|
Yes we can see skeptics getting money to betray us. Climate-experts are employed and can say what they wish.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vejadu
It's amusing that some think it's some sort of slam dunk when scientists whose funding is dependent upon climate change agree with climate change.
|
Is not like that outside US and inside Nasa etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch
Not true. Only Democrats agree that we have a severe climate problem so they can exert more control over our lives and waste more taxpayer money on a problem that does not exist.  |
So there are no problems to burn up all coal in a short time, coal as has been stored for millions of years, then its starting to emit methane as are 25x worse than CO2?
Quote:
Originally Posted by rombola4
Do ANY of them have a solution?
Isn't Obama the President? What is he doing about the problem?
ARe you saying that global warming is a result of Obama's radical energy policy?
|
Do they?
Obama was more tied to Obama care and couldnt agree with reps. on any climate issue?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cw30000
They tax. Taxation will solve all the people human create.
|
Taxation is a method to even out problems, less on green energy and more on fossile fuels.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rombola4
Why do Dems even care? Obama is the PResident. What is he doing about the situation?
|
What will Romney do?
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader
What has Obama actually proposed to solve the problem? All I've noticed is the scam of cap and trade. Of course, Romney is a complete idiot for not even accepting it is a problem. And the world of business is not the real world by a long shot, that's a world of make believe--make pieces of paper with fancy designs on it and believe it's valuable enough to destroy the world for.
|
Cap and trade is global and will work in Ca soon. Obama wish to lower CO2 emissions and had that message in Copenhagen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by joebaldknobber
Climate Scientists are not real scientists.
Just GD stupid.
|
But you are?
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
