Liberal media "jobs added"

[Follower Of X]

Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost

Reality:
Private Sector Employment, Jan 2010: 106.8 million
Private Sector Employment, Sep 2012: 111.5 million

Private Sector Jobs Added: +4.7 million (during the 32 months).

That is more jobs added than in TEN YEARS before that.


Its you who is spinning.

HOW MANY were lost EINSTEIN?

[TigerLily24]

Originally Posted by pghquest

Last months jobs were lost, but the unemployment rates dropped, and liberals celebrated that anyways.

Rick Santelli does the jobs math, CNBC staff fights it » The Right Scoop -

Of course, because jobs were added.

And now that it is clear that last month wasn't a fluke - that companies really are hiring - more people are, and will continue to be, encouraged to start looking again.

Is this a bad thing?

[Follower Of X]

Originally Posted by TigerLily24

Not true. Lots of people had stopped looking.

"The August jobs report sent chills through Wall Street and Washington because of one eye-popping number: 368,000 Americans gave up looking for work."

Why have millions of Americans given up looking for work? - CSMonitor.com

Yeah I forgot you talked with everyone who is out of work.

[EinsteinsGhost]

Originally Posted by pghquest

Last months jobs were lost...

Rick Santelli does the jobs math, CNBC staff fights it » The Right Scoop -

Typical "right wing scoop", because without lies they can't hold ground.

Fact: Private sector employment has gone up for 32 months straight, for a net increase of 4.7 million jobs.

[TigerLily24]

Originally Posted by Follower Of X

Yeah I forgot you talked with everyone who is out of work.

Wow.

Defensive much?

[msamhunter]

Everyone here is looking at merely spin. Fact remains, if the media would do it correctly is that 171,000 people were simply added to payrolls. There are 3.6 million available jobs according to BLS. Problem, populace isn't qualified to do them. It really is a misnomer about the actual availability of jobs. Granted some areas will have more than others depending on the occupation. People need someone to blame for their misfortune.

[Follower Of X]

Originally Posted by TigerLily24

Wow.

Defensive much?

If you were talking to someone who ignores the facts, you'd be too....

[TigerLily24]

Originally Posted by Follower Of X

If you were talking to someone who ignores the facts, you'd be too....

Ignores what facts?

Last month, this forum was filled with posts that stated that the only reason that the overall UE number went down was because people stopped looking for work.

Are you saying that all of those people were ignorant of the 'facts'?

[Follower Of X]

Originally Posted by TigerLily24

Ignores what facts?

Last month, this forum was filled with posts that stated that the only reason that the overall UE number went down was because people stopped looking for work.

Are you saying that all of those people were ignorant of the 'facts'?

7.8% - 7.9%

Unemployment is higher today then it was when Obama took office. What don't you understand?

[EinsteinsGhost]

Originally Posted by Follower Of X

HOW MANY were lost EINSTEIN?

+4.7 million were GAINED.

This is how math works:
Change = Increase - Decrease

If Change > 0, GAIN
If Change < 0, LOSS