Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-21-2013, 06:48 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,057,909 times
Reputation: 8527

Advertisements

I dunno, Bill, do you really expect anything substantial from Michelle?

O'Reilly slams Bachmann for 'trivial' criticisms of President Obama - POLITICO.com

O'Reilly slams Bachmann for 'trivial' criticisms of President Obama



In a rare attack on a fellow conservative, Fox News host Bill O'Reilly tonight criticized Rep. Michelle Bachmann for "playing small ball" in her recent attack on the perks President Barack Obama enjoyed in the White House.

At last week's Conservative Political Action Conference, Bachmann had criticized Obama for using tax payer money to fund "a lifestyle of excess" -- including "five chefs on Air Force One... two projectionists who operate the White House movie theater... and someone to walk the President's dog." When asked about those criticisms by CNN's Dana Bash -- who pointed out that President Obama did not have a dog-walker -- Rep. Bachmann dodged the questions and spoke instead about the attacks in Benghazi, Libya.

O'Reilly said Obama was "entitled to protection, convenience and comfort" and that Bachmann was engaged in "a trivial pursuit."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-21-2013, 07:09 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,413,043 times
Reputation: 24780
I want Bachmann to remain at the top of the GOP's leadership and mouthpiece list.

She'll forever be near the top of the lunatic list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 07:11 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,057,909 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
I want Bachmann to remain at the top of the GOP's leadership and mouthpiece list.

She'll forever be near the top of the lunatic list.

She's the mirror image of Palin, except for those crazy eyes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 07:20 AM
 
Location: Old Town Alexandria
14,496 posts, read 26,533,531 times
Reputation: 8966
More bread and circus.

Bachmann did graduate from college in time, I believe (not like palins eight year plan,LOL). You have to be a ditz to take 7 years to get a B.A.

sigh. America needs to do better. Doubt I will live to see it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 08:05 AM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,715 posts, read 31,053,666 times
Reputation: 9270
O'Reilly is spot on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 10:38 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,057,909 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffdano View Post
O'Reilly is spot on.

Yep, in this case, he is. The GOP needs to divorce these one-script wonders.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 10:45 AM
 
Location: Montreal, Quebec
15,082 posts, read 14,270,994 times
Reputation: 9789
Quote:
At last week's Conservative Political Action Conference, Bachmann had criticized Obama for using tax payer money to fund "a lifestyle of excess" -- including "five chefs on Air Force One... two projectionists who operate the White House movie theater... and someone to walk the President's dog." When asked about those criticisms by CNN's Dana Bash -- who pointed out that President Obama did not have a dog-walker -- Rep. Bachmann dodged the questions and spoke instead about the attacks in Benghazi, Libya.
Lol! I saw that. She's the one who brought it up, then was screaming at Dana Bash "Why are you bringing that up? It's not what's important!" while she was trying to run away.
Bless her heart. The comedy just never stops.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 10:54 AM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,395,828 times
Reputation: 16962
A picture forever emblazoned on the backs of my eyes will be her huffing and puffing off down a dark hallway in some building's basement twitching her hips and stomping her high heels as she goes.

If that exit were only permanent!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 10:57 AM
 
13,675 posts, read 8,957,848 times
Reputation: 10385
I bet that Ms. Bachmann is pretty poor at Trivial Pursuit.

In case she is reading this: when Gone With the Wind was being cast the producers went to Margaret Mitchell to ask what Hollywood actor she had in mind when she wrote the part of Rhett Butler (for she was a well-known fan of the movies).

Her answer:
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 10:58 AM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,623,734 times
Reputation: 9171
As a hard core conservative, I'll admit Bachman is an embarrassment to the R party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top