Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This is all your opinion. The article below is what has been released. If that is no sufficient you will have to wait. All CIA operations are not known to the public nor are the Presidents meetings with those operatives known to the public. They are kept secret for a reason. I am sure in a few years they will talk about this, but the questions that you are asking are important, why? Why do you have a need to know? If you want to know the inter workings of the CIA, go and work for the CIA. You are looking for a play by play analysis of how the CIA operates. That is the most ridiculous thing that I have ever heard.
These are my questions. All you have are endless freaking links of nameless sources.
Did 0bama wash his hands of the country of Libya, and ignore the plight and fate of the Libyan people, after his warplanes destroyed their country and topples their government?
Was he so disengaged and unconcerned with anything to do with Libya, that he was not even aware of the security concerns for the Libyan people, much less our own people that he sent to Libya?
Was he even in the command center on 9/11 during the attack on the consulate?
Did he ever meet with the heads of our intelligence agencies on Sept 11 or 12?
you cannot answer these, 0bama can answer these, so why hasn't he? You can bet your ass if those answers made him look presidential he'd have spoken them already. But instead all we have to rely on is testimony from congressional hearings, rumors and leakers, oh yeah and sensitive documents that reporters find laying on the floor of the consulate, after the FBI supposedly already went through the place.
These are my questions. All you have are endless freaking links of nameless sources.
Did 0bama wash his hands of the country of Libya, and ignore the plight and fate of the Libyan people, after his warplanes destroyed their country and topples their government?
Was he so disengaged and unconcerned with anything to do with Libya, that he was not even aware of the security concerns for the Libyan people, much less our own people that he sent to Libya?
Was he even in the command center on 9/11 during the attack on the consulate?
Did he ever meet with the heads of our intelligence agencies on Sept 11 or 12?
you cannot answer these, 0bama can answer these, so why hasn't he? You can bet your ass if those answers made him look presidential he'd have spoken them already. But instead all we have to rely on is testimony from congressional hearings, rumors and leakers, oh yeah and sensitive documents that reporters find laying on the floor of the consulate, after the FBI supposedly already went through the place.
The nameless source I am using is an Official release from the CIA. The CIA, that is who is releasing the information it is not a nameless source, it is the frickin CIA. I realize what I am dealing with now.
Here is the CIA's timeline of events. You don't like it take it up with them. It is far more credible than UNNAMED SOURCES from the laughing stock of the Media ...FoX News.
It is about credibility, which your sources and your posts are lacking. The nexus of all your stories is Fox News. They have no credibility.
CBS and Fox are the only ones that have been covering this story, only lately have some others entered into this, and all they try to do is refute Fox News.
Did 0bama know about the security concerns in Libya during the months leading up to the attack, if not, then why?
You refuse to even answer the question! You are all washed up, you have nothing to offer because you refuse to even acknowledge the questions surrounding this issue. All you do is post links to 0bama friendly news sites which quote unnamed sources, and you claim they somehow trump everyone else.
A president who can go almost two months w/o answering some simple questions, looks more and more like a president who is hiding something. Then we have the mushrooms, who are nothing but 0bama sycophants, they love to be left in the dark, and fed bull****.
The nameless source I am using is an Official release from the CIA. The CIA, that is who is releasing the information it is not a nameless source, it is the frickin CIA. I realize what I am dealing with now.
Here is the CIA's timeline of events. You don't like it take it up with them. It is far more credible than UNNAMED SOURCES from the laughing stock of the Media ...FoX News.
Your nameless source are "Senior intelligence and Defense officials say...."
From your link, another simple question the president could answer:
Republican senators including John McCain of Arizona wrote an op-ed article, published Thursday in the conservative Washington Times, in which they called on the president to answer whether "any member of the U.S. government, including senior administration officials, reject[ed] requests for greater military and intelligence assistance for our personnel on the ground in Benghazi."
Here was a reporter asking 0bama exactly that question, and 0bama refused to answer, so go stuff your unnamed sources, because the CinC refuses to answer directly.
Your nameless source are "Senior intelligence and Defense officials say...."
It was an official CIA release to news Agencies. It is rare if ever the CIA mentions members of the CIA, with the exception of the Director, who everyone already knows.
With the CIA in charge of the mission we are likely never going to find out what exactly happened. We are still waiting to find out how they were so wrong about WMD's in Iraq. You can take some consolation in the fact that the Director will probably be dumped after Obama is reelected.
One thing for sure, neither is Fox. They are taking advantage of a media blackout to fill in the gaps with lies and misrepresentations in an effort to smear the President.
Your nameless source are "Senior intelligence and Defense officials say...."
From your link, another simple question the president could answer:
Republican senators including John McCain of Arizona wrote an op-ed article, published Thursday in the conservative Washington Times, in which they called on the president to answer whether "any member of the U.S. government, including senior administration officials, reject[ed] requests for greater military and intelligence assistance for our personnel on the ground in Benghazi."
Here was a reporter asking 0bama exactly that question, and 0bama refused to answer, so go stuff your unnamed sources, because the CinC refuses to answer directly.
Actually if you think your Messiah is perfect and can do no wrong you are brainwashed. You treat Obama like Christians do Jesus Christ. Man up and admit when your guy makes a mistake instead of trying to cover it up.
everyone is human and makes mistakes, but I plan on voting for obama because he is the best option imo.. romney is a liar, fake and a joke.. is there someone that could do a better job than obama? more than likely.. but they're not on the ballot.. to equate obama to jesus is absurd... you sound like a foaming at the mouth koolaide drinker yourself... don't ASSume anything about why people vote for who they vote for and why.. because you haven't walked in their shoes.. and just because they haven't walked around their whole life in your shoes doesn't make them brainwashed
You know what??? Come Wed. we will never hear anything about this issue again. The GOP will be licking it's wounds, blaming the big storm. Gov. Christie, and MSNBC for the whomping they are going to experience.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.