Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-20-2012, 06:53 PM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,416,507 times
Reputation: 6462

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by texdav View Post
The judge will determine the pensio poayout and such as mandate under bankrupsy laws.That's really how it works.The componay basically could survive in a declining market for their goods and being near the bottom in slaes.Just about every store now has stroe brands sellig same type products. Stil its likely that it willbenefit a Cadaian compnay who has th manufacturig right to make mnay f their products such as Twinkes.Survival of the fittest imarket palce.
Doesn't the pension revert to the Feds who will not payout the pensions in full
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-20-2012, 06:53 PM
 
24,404 posts, read 23,061,247 times
Reputation: 15013
Its not the benefits you give up or the wages you get cut, its how much copper wiring and plumbing you can rip out of the building.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2012, 06:54 PM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,049,136 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Thanks for the responses, but why can't Hostess become a non-union company?
They will be...but not under the name "Hostess".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2012, 06:54 PM
 
Location: Louisiana
9,138 posts, read 5,802,841 times
Reputation: 7706
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sporin View Post
On the one hand, workers traded "less money" for "no money." Dumb, certainly.

But, they made big concessions the last time Hostess went bankrupt in 2004, already. The company is in an un-winable debt situation due to that bankruptcy, and has no path to solvency. It looks like Hostess executives have been taking steps to up their own compensation lately as well, which puts the whole thing in question.

So on the one hand, dumb union, now you have NO job, immediately.

But on the other hand, at some point, you have to put your foot down instead of agreeing to cut after cut (wages, healthcare, pension) so that Hostess can continue to tread water, compensating higher ups and boosting stock for the inevitable sale… all while paying bakers as little as possible.

So… and I am not generally pro-union… I can see both sides' arguments.

Now Hostess gets to blame the big bad Unions, but at the end of the day, no amount of concessions and job cuts was going to save this company.

Given that the majority of people seem to be happy to blame the unions I guess Hostess execs picked the right scapegoat. Shame that folks won't look behind the headlines and see the whole picture.

So why did they need a "scapegoat?"
They didn't require permission to shut down the company.
No more stockholders to please.


BTW: Hey unions, no good parasite kills its host.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2012, 06:55 PM
 
Location: Midwest
38,496 posts, read 25,811,747 times
Reputation: 10789
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
What is the alternative? You don't work and still get your unemployment and food stamps and whatever other goodies the government will provide. When there is no incentive to work folks will choose to not work. Welcome to the transformation of America provided by the democrat party.
Yep. We should all be willing to work for slave wages without benefits. We should be happy that the extremely wealthy executives of our company allow us to work so that we will not starve. That is the Republican vision.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2012, 06:55 PM
 
Location: Maryland
18,630 posts, read 19,416,507 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Thanks for the responses, but why can't Hostess become a non-union company?
It will be now or what's left of it. Or the jobs may move to Mexico.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2012, 06:56 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,358,834 times
Reputation: 7990
I think the Salon article posted by Ovacatto sounds about right. These were middle class jobs 20 years ago. They had made concessions and gone to low middle class (the guy in the article says $35,000. They were looking at more concessions, and barely better than Walmart work. But still having to presumably pay $50-75 per month in union dues

And likely this was very demanding physical work. I knew a guy who worked in a bakery, and he said it was a tough gig.

Now they will get their 99 weeks of unemployment and probably be eligible for one of the 47 federal job retraining programs that Romney said he wanted to revamp.

I bet this was a rational calculation, not a case of worker suicide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2012, 06:58 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,617,602 times
Reputation: 18521
The union should buy the company and take care of their members....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2012, 06:59 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,003,124 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Yep. We should all be willing to work for slave wages without benefits. We should be happy that the extremely wealthy executives of our company allow us to work so that we will not starve. That is the Republican vision.
Who is talking about the executives. These folks decided they'd rather not work than work. You people and your hatred of anyone who makes more money than you are beyond ridiculous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2012, 06:59 PM
 
45,230 posts, read 26,437,203 times
Reputation: 24979
Quote:
Originally Posted by jojajn View Post
Yep. We should all be willing to work for slave wages without benefits. We should be happy that the extremely wealthy executives of our company allow us to work so that we will not starve. That is the Republican vision.
How much do you pay your employees and do you provide them benefits?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:41 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top