U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-29-2012, 01:30 PM
 
7,022 posts, read 5,995,475 times
Reputation: 6980

Advertisements

It's not just the Democrats who openly oppose white males but the mainstream media is full of anti-white bigotry of late.

I wonder if any liberals on this site will admit to what's become so obvious in the years since Obama was elected?

How progressive is it, really, to racially attack one group in order to elevate another?

Articles: Target: Old White Men
While modern society prides itself on being unbiased, it's no exception to the rule that every age has its fashionable prejudices -- and unfashionable people. Among the latter today are white men, and the closer they are to "dead white male" status, to use a favored leftist descriptive, the greater the disdain in which they're held.

Thus do we see sneering at "old white men." Earlier this year, Senator Harry Reid -- one well acquainted through experience with old-white-male machinations -- complained of "angry old white men" who bankroll conservative causes. More recently, the old-white-media paper the Guardian published a piece about America's changing demographics titled, in part, "No country for angry old white men...." Ah, yes, it's not just that they're old, white, and men, that Triad of Turpitude. They're "angry," too. So just dismiss them out of hand, with their agenda born of blinding, irrational hatred. It's another example of projection, from the group (leftists) that makes intellect-clouding emotionalism an art.

 
Old 11-29-2012, 01:32 PM
 
Location: On the Group W bench
5,576 posts, read 3,608,848 times
Reputation: 2127
You're not a victim of bigotry just because other people are finally gaining the rights you've always had.

(Therefore, there's nothing for Democrats to admit...)

PS. Please don't use apostrophes for plurals. You were supposed to have learned better than that in third grade.
 
Old 11-29-2012, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
745 posts, read 912,193 times
Reputation: 871
The 1990s was when the term "angry white male" and the "war on whites" was orchestrated by shrill, hysterical contards.

It seems these whiny "angry white males" always come slithering out from under their rocks anytime a Democrat is in office.
 
Old 11-29-2012, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,777 posts, read 24,901,261 times
Reputation: 12178
The Democrat's War on Stupid White Men

That's more like it.
 
Old 11-29-2012, 01:38 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,053 posts, read 29,528,523 times
Reputation: 7830
Well this is a stupid thread to start....the angry old white men getting upset that there are not the only ones getting all the rights anymore?
 
Old 11-29-2012, 01:43 PM
 
Location: Guangzhou, China
9,779 posts, read 13,359,093 times
Reputation: 11309
Quote:
Originally Posted by renault View Post
It's not just the Democrats who openly oppose white males but the mainstream media is full of anti-white bigotry of late.

I wonder if any liberals on this site will admit to what's become so obvious in the years since Obama was elected?

How progressive is it, really, to racially attack one group in order to elevate another?

Articles: Target: Old White Men
While modern society prides itself on being unbiased, it's no exception to the rule that every age has its fashionable prejudices -- and unfashionable people. Among the latter today are white men, and the closer they are to "dead white male" status, to use a favored leftist descriptive, the greater the disdain in which they're held.

Thus do we see sneering at "old white men." Earlier this year, Senator Harry Reid -- one well acquainted through experience with old-white-male machinations -- complained of "angry old white men" who bankroll conservative causes. More recently, the old-white-media paper the Guardian published a piece about America's changing demographics titled, in part, "No country for angry old white men...." Ah, yes, it's not just that they're old, white, and men, that Triad of Turpitude. They're "angry," too. So just dismiss them out of hand, with their agenda born of blinding, irrational hatred. It's another example of projection, from the group (leftists) that makes intellect-clouding emotionalism an art.
Oh, boo hoo.

A bunch of guys who are used to thinking that they're somehow at the upper echelon of society when they're really no different than anyone else are up in arms over the fact that a guy who doesn't look like them is president. They start making a big ruckus about "racial politics" and "white guilt" and all this crud, making themselves look like idiots, and proving that they have little relevance in modern America... because they don't want to be a part of it.

Newsflash: the only people engaging in "racial politics" are you.

I am a white male, and I do not feel marginalized. I feel no kinship with these idiots who have chosen not to make even a passing effort to navigate their way through a changing society and instead want to restrict others' rights and representation. They may be Americans, but they are acting extremely un-American.

Last edited by 415_s2k; 11-29-2012 at 03:09 PM..
 
Old 11-29-2012, 01:45 PM
 
8,199 posts, read 6,130,220 times
Reputation: 11731
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Well this is a stupid thread to start....the angry old white men getting upset that there are not the only ones getting all the rights anymore?
The angry old white men are angry because everyone else is living high on the hog off of EBT cards, TANF, Section 8 and whatever other vote gaining scams the Democrats can gin up.
 
Old 11-29-2012, 01:46 PM
 
10,963 posts, read 8,054,473 times
Reputation: 3119
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
The Democrat's War on Stupid White Men

That's more like it.

 
Old 11-29-2012, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Earth
1,305 posts, read 1,255,669 times
Reputation: 1427
I live in a heavily Democratic city and I can't tell you how many times I've been attacked in this town for being white. I can't tell you because it's never ****ing happened. Really guys, grow up.
 
Old 11-29-2012, 01:51 PM
 
16,553 posts, read 11,497,119 times
Reputation: 4230
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmqueen View Post
You're not a victim of bigotry just because other people are finally gaining the rights you've always had.

(Therefore, there's nothing for Democrats to admit...)

PS. Please don't use apostrophes for plurals. You were supposed to have learned better than that in third grade.
What rights? Please list them.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top