Supreme Court Weighing Gay Marriage Cases (poll, March, spend, country)

[NY Jew]

Originally Posted by inahandbasket

If that's how you comfort yourself, then have at it.

Meanwhile, the rest of us will live in the reality based community.

If liberal policies stay take over the country the US will most likely be speaking Arabic in 120 years.

[DentalFloss]

Originally Posted by NY Jew

I don't care what the SCUS says their still wrong (though the SCUS does allow some censorship) and James Madison would agree with me not them.

James Madison is dead, and the courts have long, long ago said you're wrong. I think I'm going to take a break and watch some uncensored free porn online for a little bit. TTFN.

[inahandbasket]

Originally Posted by NY Jew

If liberal policies stay take over the country the US will most likely be speaking Arabic in 120 years.

Keep going! You're hysterical!!!!

[McBain II]

Originally Posted by NY Jew

I don't care what the SCUS says their still wrong (though the SCUS does allow some censorship) and James Madison would agree with me not them.

freedom of speech means freedom of political speech not smut.

Jesus, it is "THEY'RE" when speaking in that form. Learn some basic grammar.

Oh, and believing that the 1st Amendment is restricted to political speech is the height of absurdity.

Originally Posted by NY Jew

one thing has absolutely nothing to do with the other.

The logic and arguments were the same, and rejected.

[NY Jew]

the government has every right to censor pornography as per many SCUS decisions
United States v. One Book Called Ulysses (read the court decision)
Miller v. California

the problem is they are ever expanding the definition of speech.

[Dane_in_LA]

Originally Posted by NY Jew

you are equal your just not smart enough to realize it.

allowed marriages
a "straight" man can marry a "straight" woman
a "straight" man can marry a "gay" woman
a "gay" man can marry a "straight" woman
a "gay" man can marry a "gay" woman

not allowed marriages
a "straight" man can't marry a "straight" man
a "gay" man can't marry a "straight" man
a "gay" man can't marry a "gay" man
a "straight" woman can't marry a "straight" woman
a "gay" woman can't marry a "straight" woman
a "gay" woman can't marry a "gay" woman

Tom Cruise has just been elected Grand-Poobah-for-Life and has declared that Scientology will be the only allowed religion. Under the new law, everybody is equally free to practice Scientology and equally barred from practicing other religions.

thus there's "equal protection of the laws"

[DentalFloss]

Originally Posted by NY Jew

the problem is they are ever expanding the definition of speech.

So because you do not like or wish to view porn, it ought to be taken away from me as well? Based upon what logic?

[LuckyGem]

So they will hear two cases next year...

The Supreme Court announced Friday that it will decide two major gay marriage cases next year that could have a sweeping impact on the rights of same-sex couples to wed. The Supreme Court has never before agreed to hear a case dealing with same-sex marriage.

The court will review California's gay marriage ban, which passed in 2008 and has been struck down by two lower courts. The justices will also hear a challenge to the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which prevents the federal government from recognizing state-sanctioned gay marriages.

Supreme Court will hear two gay marriage cases

[Mictlantecuhtli]

So it is now unlikely that California will be the tenth state to legalize (again) same-sex marriage, since one or more states are likely to begin offering same-sex marriages before next summer's ruling on the Prop 8 case.

[~HecateWhisperCat~]

Originally Posted by NY Jew

NY will end gay "marriage" eventually one way or another. (there is no way this insanity will last more then 120 years)

I doubt in 50 years most of Europe will have these so called marriage laws.

You are in for a rude awakening if you believe that.