Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I am not telling you how to live your life, I am simply saying I do not wish to support something financially if I consider immoral. It makes me a partaker in immorality. Same goes with abortion. I do NOT want to support it financially.
However, this ruling will force every taxpayer to support it financially, and that is a problem.
Can you explain to me just how you're force to support SSM financially, and do SSM partners support your marriage financially?
I am not telling you how to live your life, I am simply saying I do not wish to support something financially if I consider immoral. It makes me a partaker in immorality. Same goes with abortion. I do NOT want to support it financially.
However, this ruling will force every taxpayer to support it financially, and that is a problem.
I do not consider churches to be moral, yet I am forced to subsidize their existence due to their tax exemptions. Should we get rid of churches?
With the rate of 'straight' marriages at a historical low in the USA, and divorce rates at a historical high ... we might just learn that same-sex couples have stronger, better and longer-lasting relationships. Wouldn't that be something.
I wonder if there's any way to tie this into federal charges not being filed for marijuana legality in the states that have made it legal?
If the state legalizes then the Feds shouldn't charge those in that state for something considered legal.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.