Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No I wouldn't like it but if its THEIR property then not for me to decide that.
Really? You wouldn't care if a stream running through your property was poisoned by someone else upstream? Even if you used that stream for your own drinking water or that of your animals?
They would go around them then,no toll. I think the town or the people of a town would contract with the company in return the people would give the company either money or some other services for the company in return for the paved road. All those things you mentioned we already have roads like that.
Go around on WHAT? The other private toll-road?
How would the people or town contract as an entity? Wait. I'm thinking. OK, I have an idea. They could form themselves into a group and vote on some of the people to be the leaders. Then the leaders could contract with the private road-builder.
I'm done arguing with you, kiddo. You are passionate, but lacking in experience and unable to support your arguments with logic or even good sense. Enjoy your nominal rebelliousness.
RFID chips will replace all these inefficient cards. More progress from the progressives.
The irony here is a school district in the State of Texas a bastion of American Conservatism has suggested that students be issued RFID card to keep track of students.
As part of a controversial trial that could someday include 112 schools and nearly 100,000 students, Northside Independent School District in San Antonio, Texas, recently issued students at two of its campuses new badges with an embedded RFID (radio-frequency identification) chip in order to track their locations.
Really? You wouldn't care if a stream running through your property was poisoned by someone else upstream? Even if you used that stream for your own drinking water or that of your animals?
Wow.
I said I wouldn't like it. Now this is where government does come in. Me and my neighbor have a dispute if we can't come to a reasonable conclusion then we ask for a mediator to help us.
No I wouldn't like it but if its THEIR property then not for me to decide that.
So it wouldn't bother you if your drinking water was too toxic to drink, as long as those that made it toxic only dumped their toxic waste on their personal property? That sounds like solid logic.
I said I wouldn't like it. Now this is where government does come in. Me and my neighbor have a dispute if we can't come to a reasonable conclusion then we ask for a mediator to help us.
Does that mediator work for free? What if that mediator sides with the other person, lets say with ID's and decided it is in the best interest to have everyone who wishes to drive to have a driver's license.
This isn't about ID's this is about that person spilling waste and affecting my water supply. We both pay the mediator and if they agree with the neighbor then you appeal I suppose. You think I have all of this worked out? Lol.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
