Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-05-2012, 09:52 PM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,051,128 times
Reputation: 10270

Advertisements

Maybe to fund obamacare?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-05-2012, 10:01 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,869 posts, read 26,508,031 times
Reputation: 25773
That's actually a very good question. According to Democrats (or at least liberals on this board), the entire cause of our budget deficit is the "two unfunded, illegal wars" Bush got us into. One is over...the other could be if only Obama would bring our troops home and leave Afghanistan to the Afghanistans. If that's true, our deficits are over next year, once we wind down there. So...why do we need more revenue again???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2012, 10:11 PM
 
Location: Suffolk, Va
3,027 posts, read 2,520,454 times
Reputation: 1964
For starters, ending the wars doesn't mean they're paid off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2012, 10:14 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,970,287 times
Reputation: 7315
Quote:
Originally Posted by Californian34 View Post
For starters, ending the wars doesn't mean they're paid off.
Bingo. The Greatest Generation paid for their own wars. We handed our kids our credit card bill. How patriotic?

I'd love a Constitutional Amendment requiring an IRS surtax the year after any war or warlike engagement occurs..automatic, No Congressional vote. All pay based on last years tax liability the same % as a surtax (calculation would be cost/prior years tax collections). So if war costs 5% of prior year IRS collections, and your total annual tax liability was $20,000, surtax is $1,000 added on.

Now lets watch them wave the flag as they pay for wars in their own era.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2012, 10:19 PM
 
Location: Limbo
6,512 posts, read 7,549,515 times
Reputation: 6319
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
Maybe to fund obamacare?
Those wars were unfunded, no?

Just because we stopped spending hundreds of billions/year overseas doesn't mean we shouldn't recover the initial outlay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2012, 10:24 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,869 posts, read 26,508,031 times
Reputation: 25773
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtn View Post
Bingo. The Greatest Generation paid for their own wars. We handed our kids our credit card bill. How patriotic?

I'd love a Constitutional Amendment requiring an IRS surtax the year after any war or warlike engagement occurs..automatic, No Congressional vote. All pay based on last years tax liability the same % as a surtax (calculation would be cost/prior years tax collections). So if war costs 5% of prior year IRS collections, and your total annual tax liability was $20,000, surtax is $1,000 added on.

Now lets watch them wave the flag as they pay for wars in their own era.



Nice rant, too bad it isn't quite true. The deficit was higher from '41-45 (in inflation adjusted dollars) then any time when major fighting was going on in Iraq. As a matter of fact, it was higher than at any time until Obama came along and drove huge increases in spending. The things we are passing on for future generations to pay for really are the Obama stimulus, Obamacare and of course interest on the debt. But I agree...we desperately need to quit spending money we don't have and quit passing on debt to future generations. I don't have an issue with a "war surcharge" as you propose. When our elected leaders involve us in a war, everyone should pay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2012, 10:28 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,970,287 times
Reputation: 7315
Not a rant, nor specific to any war. Just a belief that the present generation should pay for its war every single time.

In that scenario, war costs should be considered independent of the current domestic budget.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2012, 10:33 PM
 
5,760 posts, read 11,546,851 times
Reputation: 4949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post

Nice rant, too bad it isn't quite true. The deficit was higher from '41-45 (in inflation adjusted dollars) then any time when major fighting was going on in Iraq. As a matter of fact, it was higher than at any time until Obama came along and drove huge increases in spending.
Neither is that quite true. Bushco was running the Endless War(s) off the books. Less deficit because it was being rolled straight into the debt. O and the (D)s started putting it on the books as legit accounting. You fell for the lie(s). (again?)

Quote:
The things we are passing on for future generations to pay for really are the Obama stimulus, Obamacare and of course interest on the debt. But I agree...we desperately need to quit spending money we don't have and quit passing on debt to future generations.
Much of the Stimulus was at least spent IN the US and it did seem to help arrest the collapse. Good Trick on that pony. You know we can stop paying interest on the debt any time we want? Just the Bankers and Wealthy would be less than pleased.

Quote:

I don't have an issue with a "war surcharge" as you propose. When our elected leaders involve us in a war, everyone should pay.
Perot had that claim, as well. Not been popular with the MIC.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2012, 10:35 PM
 
1,724 posts, read 1,471,430 times
Reputation: 780
Obamacare is not the main driver of our deficits. In fact, it has not even kicked in.

Plus, Obama is one of the most Conservative spenders in modern day history.

Please stop your bullocks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2012, 10:37 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,869 posts, read 26,508,031 times
Reputation: 25773


Still want to try to argue that the issue is defense spending???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:14 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top