Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
uh no, they are paid with money looted from the private sector.
Well then, according to you, they should all be fired to help the American economy...then you can Republicanlly whine about those lazy losers who don't want to work.
Well then, according to you, they should all be fired to help the American economy...then you can Republicanlly whine about those lazy losers who don't want to work.
no, they can find private sector jobs where people pay them of their own free will
Even if the OP is misleading, during a depression there should be a huge increase in public sector employment to spur economic growth and then scaled back when the country is exiting the recovery phase and going into prosperity mode. The budget should be cut and balanced when economic times are good/when tax receipts are high, never doing a depression/recession
During a depression, when the government has LESS tax revenue, and is borrowing and spending money like a drunken sailor on many things that do not work, you think they should hire MORE people, and spend MORE money they don't have?
The budget should be cut and balanced when things are good. Are you really serious?
That's like saying, I got a raise, so it's time for me to cut my budget and if I have a pay cut, I should increase my spending and not worry about balancing my household budget? That's inane.
Yes, really. Saving when times are good allows you to have money when times are bad.
Comparing household spending to government spending is also ridiculous.
WOW! Isn't that almost 150, 000 AMERICANS who have a job now?
Good for Obama!
And good for America!!!
Typical.
No matter what government does, you love it, and you don't even know who these people are, or what these jobs are, just the fact that government did it, is enough for you.
Those 150,000 jobs, at an average salary and compensation of $70,000 equals and extra $10,500,000,000 more each year the few working people left, have to pay.
Did we need to add such a heavy burden on a nation going thru "the worst economy since the Great Depression?" Or should we have tried and scaled back the government spending and waste, fraud and abuse, until we climb out of this four year long, economic hell hole?
Those Clinton years keep looking better and better, don't they? Who knew?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
