If Obama Continues On His Destructive Path Of Socialism Would You Resort To Civil Disobedience To Stop Him (employment, lawyer)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
God, learn how to use the ellipsis would you? It's not used for a dramatic drop off. It is used to quote a passage out of an article or text without using the entire passage. Good grief.
Anyway, as a Veteran of the Military I can tell you that Obama is NOT an enemy of the Constitution. You would do well to know what the hell you're talking about before you start trying to incite violence on the POTUS.
Oh...we older soldiers know alright. You never got one ^ in the mail, at the VA, or anywhere? Read up....
We don't give a damn what HE thinks about it either.
Sensible people who see such a topic and question avoid it. Which they should. What person in their right mind wants it on digital record that they are going to support violent revolution? That is what the real question is - is it not? Forget it..anyone who is intelligent is not ever going to show their cards...You want revolution- It is done within the mind of the individual. It is a bloodless event.
You are comparing MLK's civil disobedience (that was segregating Americans) to one persons idea of what socialism is.
i cant say exactly what his ideas are as he didnt statement. My point is for home to explain what exactly he sees as socialist.
The OP, as I read it, wants to know whether some would go so far as to engage in civil disobedience were Obama's putative socialist excesses to cross some line. Others interpreted 'civil disobedience' as 'violence' and 'insurrection', either to mischaracterize the OP's question or because they didn't understand it. Civil dsobedience is neither violent nor insurrective. It's other name is 'peaceable assembly to petition the government for the redress if grievances'. Should civil disobedience turn violent it's a whole 'nother kettle of fish with seperate and distinct justifications being necessary. I would defend the right of the people disobey unjust laws. Violence is another matter.
I thought you guys were seceding or moving out of the country? What happen with the secession plans, it seems to of all but died off now that every Con has sobered up from the loss in November.
I don't see what you're trying to prove or get at here. Also what are you implying with using " ^ " in your sentence structure?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.