Liberals:Why not sword control? (fence, gun control, defence, murder)

[Deezus]

Originally Posted by pch1013

If everyone had swords, no one would ever die from a sword wound again!

The obvious solution to sword violence is just more guns...


Raiders of the Lost Ark - Why Guns Are Better Than Swords - YouTube

[victorianpunk]

Originally Posted by desertdetroiter

LMAO....we actually have a thread that talks about swords and cars being equal to guns. Wow.

.

Cars are a form of transportation, not intended as weapons. Swords, like hand guns, were designed with one intention: to kill people.

We already regulate guns and now the liberals want more regulations on guns...but we don't regulate swords at all.

[pch1013]

Originally Posted by victorianpunk

Cars are a form of transportation, not intended as weapons. Swords, like hand guns, were designed with one intention: to kill people.

We already regulate guns and now the liberals want more regulations on guns...but we don't regulate swords at all.

If 30,000 people a year were being killed with swords, I'm sure someone would be agitating to regulate them somehow.

Since you seem to be so concerned about the issue, why don't you?

[rw47]

Well excuse me but I don't see why car death is any better than sword or gun death. Are those lives worth less? Someone explain this to me.

The only reasoning I can come up with is that the benefits of car ownership outweigh the 40,000 yearly deaths.

[victorianpunk]

Originally Posted by pch1013

If 30,000 people a year were being killed with swords, I'm sure someone would be agitating to regulate them somehow.

Re-read the OP: numbers are irrelevant. So you would shrug at a mother who had her child killed by a sword?

Since you seem to be so concerned about the issue, why don't you?

A few deaths mean nothing to me. My advice to the people shocked at school shooting is this: SUCK IT UP. People die, even kids sometimes, and S***t happens.

[victorianpunk]

Originally Posted by SamBarrow

Well excuse me but I don't see why car death is any better than sword or gun death. Are those lives worth less? Someone explain this to me.

Thank you for stating the obvious people don't want to admit exists.

[logline]

Let me see... you were too dense to get it in your other fake thread, so you started another one here huh? Wow.

Let's get this straight... gun regulation is about stopping MASS MURDER. We don't have a problem with mass murder in this country when it comes to swords or martial arts or anything else you'll undoubtedly start a new thread about. Get a clue, dude.

[rw47]

Originally Posted by victorianpunk

Thank you for stating the obvious people don't want to admit exists.

I just want one of them to admit that they believe the benefits of transportation by automobile to be worth 40,000 deaths per year.

[pch1013]

Originally Posted by victorianpunk

Re-read the OP: numbers are irrelevant. So you would shrug at a mother who had her child killed by a sword?

No, what makes you think that?

A few deaths mean nothing to me. My advice to the people shocked at school shooting is this: SUCK IT UP. People die, even kids sometimes, and S***t happens.

Oh.

[mohawkx]

Originally Posted by victorianpunk

Thank you for stating the obvious people don't want to admit exists.

The winds of change are blowing at gale force and you guys are still too stupid to turn around when you pee.