Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-20-2012, 12:41 AM
 
1,684 posts, read 1,185,218 times
Reputation: 349

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Handz View Post
Sounds awfully unreliable to me.
AGREED...Nothing like a text jockey FAWKING with your life!









Glock 21 Buried 2 years then 500rd test fire - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-20-2012, 12:42 AM
 
Location: Texas
44,254 posts, read 64,351,440 times
Reputation: 73932
Yeah. I'd have no issue with it at all.
In fact, it'd help me keep my guns out of my safe.
However, even the biometric safes fail quite a bit.
So the tech has to be there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2012, 12:44 AM
 
1,684 posts, read 1,185,218 times
Reputation: 349
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Handz View Post
Well considering I use my guns for protecting my home and my family....

No, I'm not for new technology.. With new technology often comes initial failure rates or engineering flaws.

Get back to me when there is years of verifiable testing.

I have clammy hands at times... I like to wear hand protection when I shoot as do most people.. so what about that issue?
Me too!

Quote:
Originally Posted by logline View Post
Alright! Now we're getting somewhere!

I think it's a workable compromise since everybody gets what they want: gun owners keep their rights, kids don't get shot accidentally and stolen guns will be rendered useless.
No thanks!



Glock Underwater - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2012, 12:47 AM
 
1,684 posts, read 1,185,218 times
Reputation: 349

1000 Round Glock Torture Test Part One - YouTube

1000 Round Glock Torture Test Part Two - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2012, 12:48 AM
 
3,598 posts, read 4,948,253 times
Reputation: 3169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speleothem View Post
Wouldya bet yer life on it?
If you think about it, there are probably several examples where people already "bet their life" on biometric authentification technology. Think about high security zones. Bank vaults. FBI. CIA. Etc.

I bet older "dumb guns" jam more frequently than this "smart gun" would ever jam (at least in terms of the technology is concerned... maybe they'd still jam as much as before for the same old mechanical reasons). All I ever hear about on the news is how guns have jammed at the wrong time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2012, 12:50 AM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,000,960 times
Reputation: 5455
I found this article from back in '00. Looks like some Canadian company was working with S&W on this very thing. Not sure what ever became of it probably never caught on.

'Smart gun' requires owner's fingerprint - CBC News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2012, 12:52 AM
 
16,431 posts, read 22,194,526 times
Reputation: 9623
Shall not be infringed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2012, 12:57 AM
 
8,091 posts, read 5,909,991 times
Reputation: 1578
Can never go wrong with a Glock!!

My G19 has never stood me up!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2012, 12:57 AM
 
3,598 posts, read 4,948,253 times
Reputation: 3169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bideshi View Post
Shall not be infringed.
life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

See? We can quote stuff all day but what's the point?

Besides, nothing is being infringed with this technology.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2012, 12:59 AM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,927,795 times
Reputation: 11790
Quote:
Originally Posted by logline View Post
It's a "fingerprint gun".... it only works if the licensed/registered owner is the one holding the grip. If we made ALL guns with this feature, Newtown wouldn't have happened and responsible gun owners would not have their 2nd Amendment rights infringed upon. Heck, even my crappy laptop that I'm using to write this has this technology built-in, so I know it's not that expensive. It's been 100% reliable every day for years. Think of the accidental kid deaths this could save.

Fingerprint Gun For Better Public Security | Tuvie

How could the NRA argue against this?
I'm predicting that this will be near universal 15-20 years from now. Something like this just begs to be implemented on a wide scale.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top