Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
When was the last time a mass murderer used a car to purposely run down 30 innocent victims?
Quote:
Originally Posted by A Common Anomaly
Why would I be upset? I don't want to ban guns and I find it amusing that Cons related guns to cars and food all while blaming video games for murderers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trimac20
Weapons are designed to maim, injure or kill. A car is not. Need I repeat myself again?
That sure wasn't any accident. 30? THOUSANDS dead.
Why would I be upset? I don't want to ban guns and I find it amusing that Cons related guns to cars and food all while blaming video games for murderers.
Who's the fool who said anything about banning video games?
Oh, never mind. It was YOU.
Clue: If parents parented, kids wouldn't be spending their lives playing that crap.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trimac20
Weapons are designed to maim, injure or kill. A car is not. Need I repeat myself again?
Please don't. Your mantra is exceptionally boring. And dumb.
All of these people would be still alive if we banned car ................
The day that banning firearms will bring the Country to a standstill will be the day that we can equate the gun to cars, or airoplanes, or trains etc etc etc BUT guns are NOT needed by the public on the street in any law abiding society................ i have never seen or heard such undiluted rubbish as is being dished out here by the head of the NRA and the "gun nuts".
In Countries with tough gun laws...NO schools etc have armed guards.
All of these people would be still alive if we banned car
Would someone some day explain to these people difference between accidents involving transportation necessities and weapons designed and used to inflict intentional harm.
Would someone some day explain to these people difference between accidents involving transportation necessities and weapons designed and used to inflict intentional harm.
Please!
Just like they are unable to distinguish between a 6 day old fetus and a 6 year old child - the RWNJ also seem unable to distinguish between a car and a gun.
Definition of CAR: [SIZE=7]car[/SIZE]
/kär/
Noun
An automobile.
A vehicle that runs on rails, esp. a railroad car.
Definition of Gun: [SIZE=7]gun[/SIZE]
/gən/
Noun
A weapon incorporating a metal tube from which bullets, shells, or other missiles are propelled by explosive force, typically making a...
Verb
Shoot someone with a gun.
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,544 posts, read 56,047,835 times
Reputation: 11862
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto
Would someone some day explain to these people difference between accidents involving transportation necessities and weapons designed and used to inflict intentional harm.
Please!
I would, but I don't particularly enjoy squeezing blood from a stone.
Those are called accidents. Cars were not designed to kill and in fact there has been great effort to make them as safe as possible. The main purpose of a car is transportation. The main purpose of a gun is to kill. Or take target practice.
Are you suggesting that death and injury caused by an impaired driver is an accident ? From a statistical standpoint: What would you propose your odds of being killed by a firearm, verses a vehicle crash involving a drunk/impaired driver verses a legally owned firearm..........check the numbers and get back to me !
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.