Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Guess again .... liberals are the ones who believe in raising taxes to meet our needs for whatever our nation requires.
It's you conservatives that don't want to raise taxes ever!
You conservatives are always fighting against tax increases, which is why our nation is severely in debt, and can't afford better protection in public schools.
You conservatives can blame YOURSELVES for what happened in Newtown!!!
So conservatives massacred those poor little kids in CT, huh?
Obama can send his kids anywhere he chooses. He chooses to pay for a better school with even more protection.
And secret service protection is ALWAYS given to the children of presidents.
The kids that attend Sidwell Friends are the children of numerous Diplomats and other high target children so of course they have a serious security issue and the resources to deal with them. Having said that, do you think for a hot second that the Secret Service relies on Sidwell's security staff? If you think that you are daft, the Secret Service trust no one with the security of their charges. So I have no idea as to what the point of your post was.
It's kinda funny to see people who pretend to be some kind of conservatives demand massive government intervention and massive government spending just because they think a "good conservative" always agrees with NRA.
The vast majority of U.S. citizens are completely unknown to the rest of the world, and are not likely to be specifically targeted in some criminal act.
Liberals, by their nature, are always hypocritical.
Libs are-
for the homeless, but never take them into their home
for minorities, but never live in a minority neighborhood
for affirmative action, but would be angry if passed over for a promotion by a less qualified minority
for affirmative action, but would be angry if thier child was denied a college spot taken by a less qualified minority
for higher taxes, as long as someone else pays them
for "green energy", but complain about high energy prices
for redistribution of wealth, but would never offer to give half their income to someone else
for legalization of drugs, but would be upset if their child became a drug addict
against guns, unless they are used to protect them
for redistribution, but would not allow their child to average his "A" with an "F" student so both could get "C"s in school. It would be out of "fairness".
Liberalism is exposed as insanity when practiced on a personal, micro level. The ridiculous nature of its principles become blatantly obvious and seem absurd at a personal level, yet are embraced on a macro level.
Fuuny how Repugs defend and worship as their only god, The Wealthy.....except for now when they're writhing in jealousy over The Wealthy being able to afford more protection for their children.....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
