Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-25-2012, 06:29 PM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,124,502 times
Reputation: 12920

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by steven_h View Post
That was as stupid as anything I've heard from the right. That's like saying "everyone has the choice of being wealthy" as if it's that easy. By this logic, all we need to do is tell all poor people "go get some money!" Basically your statement is a contradiction to itself, because only the wealthy have access to guarded schools. I'm guessing that you are/were one of those.
This is the stupid response I expect from the extreme extreme left. Just because I have a steady job you consider me wealthy. You put up barriers for yourself, fall into the welfare system and then complain that you don't have any opportunity. It's real simple. Work hard at getting an education and then work hard at your career. It worked for Obama, it can work for you.

Anyone can get where they need to be to have access to these schools if they wanted to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-25-2012, 06:35 PM
 
6,802 posts, read 6,711,756 times
Reputation: 1911
Quote:
Originally Posted by steven_h View Post
That was as stupid as anything I've heard from the right. That's like saying "everyone has the choice of being wealthy" as if it's that easy. By this logic, all we need to do is tell all poor people "go get some money!" Basically your statement is a contradiction to itself, because only the wealthy have access to guarded schools. I'm guessing that you are/were one of those.
I guess you need to define what you consider wealthy.

Clovis Unified School District has established a school district police department in CA. 1 of 14 districts to do so.

Clovis Unified School District
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2012, 06:41 PM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,645,339 times
Reputation: 4784
It's so ironic that many now feel that school funds should be spent in arming guards at schools. We're so focused on a policing solution for a problem, instead of looking more at prevention. One shared factor amongst many of the school shooters is that they were bullied. We don't know about Adam Lanza but I wouldn't be surprised if he was. Maybe we should look into making greater efforts to reduce bullying, and improve community mental health resources rather than picking up more guns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2012, 06:52 PM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,308,171 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by tofurkey View Post
Homeschool the two girls. There's plenty of teachers looking for work and leaves eleven gun toters looking for work. Should make *******s ecstatic. And David Gregory can find his own protection for his kids.
First of all the 11 guards aren't just for the Obama girls, they guard the entire school which is a school for kids with high profile parents. Second of all, what you're suggesting is that we should turn the children of presidents into prisoners for 4 or 8 years, don't let them out to interact with kids their own ages. It's hard enough to get good people to run for the office as it is, what you're suggesting would make it even harder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2012, 07:00 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,672,493 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBest View Post
Everyone has the option to send their kids to a guarded school. Big deal.
Someone as opposed to the Second Amendment as Obama is, should not have the option of a guarded school, nor should the agents around him be armed. Or are you admitting that Obama is a hypocriit? Or an elitist who views himself and his own family as special and deserving of protection while the little people are to be defenseless?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2012, 07:03 PM
 
14,011 posts, read 14,995,436 times
Reputation: 10465
In fact, they don't need as much protection, because if Obama's kids were kidnapped, the entire CIA, FBI, Navy Seals, Army Rangers ect. would end up being dedicated to getting them out safe, because he tells them what to do.
If your kids were kidnapped and held hostage for ransom, you would get maybe a SWAT team if your lucky.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2012, 07:05 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,672,493 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
First of all the 11 guards aren't just for the Obama girls, they guard the entire school which is a school for kids with high profile parents. Second of all, what you're suggesting is that we should turn the children of presidents into prisoners for 4 or 8 years, don't let them out to interact with kids their own ages. It's hard enough to get good people to run for the office as it is, what you're suggesting would make it even harder.
And why are the lives of "high profile" types any more valuable than anyone else's? Obama is a superb hypocrit -- he obviously believes in the elite having weapons for protection, he views himself and his children as some kind of aristocrats whose lives are to be protected but to hell with the lowly peons.

If there were an honest bone in Obama, he would have those guards and his security agents unarmed. Just like he insists on the people having no protection.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2012, 07:07 PM
 
6,802 posts, read 6,711,756 times
Reputation: 1911
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
In fact, they don't need as much protection, because if Obama's kids were kidnapped, the entire CIA, FBI, Navy Seals, Army Rangers ect. would end up being dedicated to getting them out safe, because he tells them what to do.
If your kids were kidnapped and held hostage for ransom, you would get maybe a SWAT team if your lucky.
I don't know where you are but often the FBI is involved and Amber alerts go out and many resources are given to kidnappings.

Somehow a SWAT team doesn't sound like the right law enforcement response to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2012, 07:26 PM
 
Location: Texas State Fair
8,560 posts, read 11,210,493 times
Reputation: 4258
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman
First of all the 11 guards aren't just for the Obama girls, they guard the entire school which is a school for kids with high profile parents. Second of all, what you're suggesting is that we should turn the children of presidents into prisoners for 4 or 8 years, don't let them out to interact with kids their own ages. It's hard enough to get good people to run for the office as it is, what you're suggesting would make it even harder.
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
And why are the lives of "high profile" types any more valuable than anyone else's? Obama is a superb hypocrit -- he obviously believes in the elite having weapons for protection, he views himself and his children as some kind of aristocrats whose lives are to be protected but to hell with the lowly peons.

If there were an honest bone in Obama, he would have those guards and his security agents unarmed. Just like he insists on the people having no protection.
Some libs can't see or hear beyond the end of their own ammunition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2012, 07:30 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
9,828 posts, read 9,409,015 times
Reputation: 6288
Quote:
Originally Posted by btownboss4 View Post
In fact, they don't need as much protection, because if Obama's kids were kidnapped, the entire CIA, FBI, Navy Seals, Army Rangers ect. would end up being dedicated to getting them out safe, because he tells them what to do.
If your kids were kidnapped and held hostage for ransom, you would get maybe a SWAT team if your lucky.
Some seriously bad logic here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:39 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top