Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-02-2013, 08:17 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,051,710 times
Reputation: 17864

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
Additionally fines for not recycling are a pretty damn good idea since it costs towns huge amounts of money to deal with trash if they have full landfills,
Recyclables have value. My private trash hauler picks recyclables up for free because he gets paid for them. The city down the road that doesn't allow private haulers has fees...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-02-2013, 08:22 AM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,714 posts, read 31,176,487 times
Reputation: 9270
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
The ban on super-sized sodas does nothing more than call attention to consumption of too much. Nothing precludes anyone from buying/drinking more than one.

Many states allow employers to fire people because they are overweight, smoke ( in their private life), consume alcohol ( in their private life) endorse different politics than their employer or buy the competitor's product.

Whose Life Is It Anyway? - CBS News
If a person's size/weight impacts their ability to do their job, firing is reasonable.

Smoking, though a lifestyle issue, has an economic impact to an employer that provides health insurance. When you buy life insurance, the life insurance company will set your rates based on your health and lifestyle risks. If you are a skydiver your rates will be higher. So once again it is reasonable to discriminate against smokers.

Alcohol is another issue. But moderate use of alcohol typically correlates with good health. But abuse is a different story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 08:26 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,948,900 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatwoods View Post
Both sides are guilty of this. Red states usually have strict alcohol laws and the majority of dry counties. The only really non restrictive places are Nevada and a few cities like New Orleans.
Absolutely. Conservatives can't complain about social engineering when they try themselves to make abortion access difficult.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 08:40 AM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,392,719 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Recyclables have value. My private trash hauler picks recyclables up for free because he gets paid for them. The city down the road that doesn't allow private haulers has fees...
The issue is not recyclables not having value the issue is people disposing of recyclables as though they are trash (improper sorting) e.g. why there are fines for not sorting your trash. Personally though I am a big fan of just having bottle bills since that tends to make people even more keen to sort their trash.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 09:47 AM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,462,326 times
Reputation: 5752
I'd add the 49 states that prohibit motorcyclists from splitting lanes in heavy traffic.

The only state that doesn't? California.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 09:53 AM
 
4,684 posts, read 4,573,520 times
Reputation: 1588
Sunscreen and transfats? Pah. You want real nanny-state laws? Try PA - the state with a Republican majority in the senate, and a Republican majority in the house, and a Republican governor.

Which nonetheless is still operating a monopoly on the sale of all alcoholic beverages. Despite that Governor's campaign pledge to abolish the state stores. Because, you know, 80 years after the end of prohibition, you can't trust adults to buy a bottle of chardonnay from a grocery store clerk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 09:57 AM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,462,326 times
Reputation: 5752
Quote:
Originally Posted by squarian View Post
Sunscreen and transfats? Pah. You want real nanny-state laws? Try PA - the state with a Republican majority in the senate, and a Republican majority in the house, and a Republican governor.

Which nonetheless is still operating a monopoly on the sale of all alcoholic beverages. Despite that Governor's campaign pledge to abolish the state stores. Because, you know, 80 years after the end of prohibition, you can't trust adults to buy a bottle of chardonnay from a grocery store clerk.
Yep. Give me nanny-state California any day, where any sober person of legal drinking age can buy a fifth of vodka at Safeway at 3am on a Sunday.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 09:59 AM
 
531 posts, read 501,603 times
Reputation: 488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatwoods View Post
The only really non restrictive places are Nevada and a few cities like New Orleans.
If Las Vegas is what true, unfettered Libertarianism looks like, then bring on the regulation!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-02-2013, 12:10 PM
 
Location: Coos Bay, Oregon
7,138 posts, read 11,030,239 times
Reputation: 7808
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Lennox 70 View Post
America's 'Nanny State' Laws

So its illegal in parts of Minnesota to get a little mud on your tires like Brad Paisley sings??? And banning Happy Meals. This is the kind of stuff liberals come up with while they refuse to crack down on illegal immigration and sentence violent murderers and drug dealers to death or life in prison!
Yep, blame it on liberals like George W. Bush.

Online Gambling

For a generation of online gamblers, the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006, signed into law by President George W. Bush, effectively ended their chances of striking it rich through poker-playing or other games over the Internet. In 2005,it was estimated that 1.8 million people playing online every day — and Christiansen Capital Advisors estimated that revenues from online poker reached $2.4 billion that year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-10-2013, 01:44 PM
 
1 posts, read 791 times
Reputation: 10
Red state FLA and legislature

Did new Florida law make computers and phones illegal? - CNN.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top