We Should RESPECT This Man. He Wore The Uniform: Letter From U.S. Marine To Dianne Feinstein About His Guns Goes Viral (soldiers, Schumer)

[DewDropInn]

Originally Posted by jackmccullough

Hey, Old Army Soldier, there are at least seven posts on this thread challenging your fallacious appeal to authority with the claim that this guy is somehow entitled to greater consideration of his opinion because of his military service.

I guess you don't have a response. You're all over getting in people's faces about what guns they own, if any, but you have utterly failed to respond to substantive posts with substantive responses.

Lol, You might as well give that a rest.

The OP quickly joined the list of ultra-conservatives who start a thread and then fail to respond to anyone asking a question or posting a counter argument. He'll insult and call names. He'll agree with people who agree with him. But beyond that it's all talk and no substance. Once he complains about whatever he's complaining about that's pretty much it. (And the obligatory lecture on how patriotic he and whomever is his flavor of the day is.) He'll start two or three threads a day never to return once his lecture and/or rant is finished.

[Dale Cooper]

Originally Posted by Mellowmike

Using gun nut logic, we should also respect Tim McVeigh as he too wore the uniform & there's no doubt that he would agree with this Marine.

Why don't you folks who have no respect for the law relocate in a country such as Somalia.

I like Diane Feinstein & I live in California. I don't like a lot of the Senators & Representatives from other states, and would like to see them recalled, as they write legislation that I don't agree with.

Oh, lookie! It's the Somalia defense!

lmao@u.

[IBMMuseum]

Originally Posted by gomexico

He's not a loyal American. He's one of the 'nut cases' the military occassioinally jettisons.

Warner Todd Huston interviewed him, and identified Joshua Boston as a "Retired Corporal" (after just 8 years of service), which is not possible unless he is medically disabled in the line of duty. If he's doing the false representation himself (like Craig Pulsey recently did "defending" his son's school), veterans should be upset at the guy, not supporting him. We sure have been hearing about some strange Marines lately.

[california-jewel]

Originally Posted by BruSan

Understand your ire. However, did they at any time express a desire to arm themselves? Was it their choice to remain unarmed in their own home? Was their right to own a firearm, in fact, infinged upon, or was it their choice?

No one is accusing or attempting to colour "responsible gun owners" as being anything other than just that, but here's the rub; your definition of "responsible" might not dovetail with a majority opinion.

And i don't care if they do or don't my life is not run by what others think. Also not everyone on this board have had a realitive murdered in their own home.

I do know know that both my family members, never expressed to be murdered in the privacy of their own home. By thugs.

And that is not my point, criminal element, thugs, punks, gang bangers, mafiaso types, murderers, burglars, will always have guns, no matter what. To think not is plain freaking ingorant.

My definiation of responsible are people i know who have owned guns, from the time they were little, and now in their fifties sixties, never once an accident, or handling of the gun in a inmature childish, dangerous manner.

[Old Army Soldier]

I would like to say that I appreciate the multiple appreciation thanks to me. I can't thank you enough.

[old_cold]

The only members of the military that I hold extra special concern for are the ones that were drafted.

[hawkeye2009]

Originally Posted by burdell

Typically hypocritical self-Righteous whiners who cuddle up to the law of the land when it suits them (2nd Amendment) yet proclaim themselves above the law when it doesn't.


Pick a side you cowards, get off the damn fence and decide whether the law matters or it doesn't.

???????????

I fail to see the logic in your argument or any evidence of "selective" rejection of "the law". Typically, liberal retorts are confused and without structure, so I guess I should not be surprised.

Conservatives want the nation to adhere to THE CONSTITUTION and that behavior is very consistent and unwavering. Liberals, on the other hand, create laws to financially benefit some, at the expense of others, to secure a constituency of dependents.

Again, most gun owners will reject an illegal decree (as it is a violation of the Constitution) and will retain thier weapons. I am not aware of any police force that would attempt to come and confiscate weapons, as-

a. they would be slaughtered in the first state in which it was attempted and thier forces would be depleted.

b. most of the law enforcement officers and military active duty and vets are firearms owners

[MaseMan]

Of course, no one important is actually calling for mass gun seizures in this country, but that won't stop you from fantasizing about your wet dream of slaughtering fellow Americans in the name of "FREEDOM."

[Mellowmike]

Originally Posted by Dale Cooper

Oh, lookie! It's the Somalia defense!

lmao@u.

Just suggesting a place where the gun obsessed crowd would be free to do as they want.
If you would prefer to stay in the United States and ignore the laws that you disagree with, it's your choice. I'm sure you will enjoy your incarceration with like minded individuals.

[lifeexplorer]

Originally Posted by Mellowmike

Just suggesting a place where the gun obsessed crowd would be free to do as they want.
If you would prefer to stay in the United States and ignore the laws that you disagree with, it's your choice. I'm sure you will enjoy your incarceration with like minded individuals.

When do you realize it is not about guns? It is about rights and about staying true to the constitution. By the way it is your rights too.