Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Handful eh? I do believe the Texas petition had almost 1 million signatures.That's not a handful
But hey let Odumber ignore it. We tried the peaceful way and he ignored us so he can't get to pissy when it comes to doing it the hard way. He forced our hand.
President Obama has no authority but to ignore it as there is no constitutional provision to de-admit states to the union.
If it was up to me, I'd cut the new nation of Dumfucistan loose.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC
For the way Obama spends money he doesn't have, he needs to go looking for a few more new states to bring it up to his 57 number.
What money did Obama spend that wasn't passed by the Republican House?
btw..
Texas says hi
we have a surplus this year, obama's begging to raise the debt limit so he can pay his leg-humpers their allowance this month.
Actually, the purpose of raising the debt ceiling is to pay for spending that the Congress already appropriated. If the Republicans in the House were really serious about the deficit they'd either raise taxes or cut spending -- but they'd rather spend more than they tax and then complain about the deficit that they created, while denying the President the ability to pay that debt.
Texas has a surplus, not because of any conservative policies, but because they are lucky enough to have oil under the ground that is fetching high prices.
Then he can only blame himself and his regime when a civil war breaks out...the states are not going to be pushed around by Obama and his illegal regime....
He has everything ready (Laws,etc) to handle that when it happens!! (And it will be quite bad)
The latest citizen-generated petition on the official White House site:
Eliminate armed guards for the President, Vice-President, and their families, and establish Gun Free Zones around them.
Gun Free Zones are supposed to protect our children, and some politicians wish to strip us of our right to keep and bear arms. Those same politicians and their families are currently under the protection of armed Secret Service agents. If Gun Free Zones are sufficient protection for our children, then Gun Free Zones should be good enough for politicians.
Heh. But really, the logic is hard to argue with. Schools are gun-free zones because we care so much about our children’s safety, right? Well, unless your children go to, say, Sidwell Friends. No need to take any risks where really important kids are concerned! Follow the link above to sign the petition, which has nearly 18,000 signatures so far.
But.. but... but what is good for him or the Hollywood hypocrites is not good for us.
I am sorry, the argument that the President of the United States and his family aren't a special case that needs protection is idiotic on its face -- especially considering the history of assassinations and assassination attempts.
How quickly you forget MTA. Right off the top of my head I can think of one big bill that is a huge expenditure, more than even first considered, that even Pelosi said had to be passed to see what was in it--Obamacare. Not one House Republican voted for it. It's the House Republicans that are trying to get the White House to cut spending without success. Hopefully Obama will not continue the in your face attitude. While many on this list would love a Republican smack down, his predecessors say that is foolishness and got a lot more accomplished without this divisiveness. I don't really think he wants that to be his legacy, but who knows.
Here's an article for you. It's even got a little chart which you'll love.
I am sorry, the argument that the President of the United States and his family aren't a special case that needs protection is idiotic on its face -- especially considering the history of assassinations and assassination attempts.
Well, if gun-free zones protect our children from mass shootings, why wouldn't they protect the president?
The WH should have accepted the 9th petition, which called for the deportation of those who had signed the other 8.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
