Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If they're really interested in saving the planet, why don't they make more fuel efficient tires that require less (or zero) oil to make? Why did they kill the electric car in the 60's, 70's and 80's? Why is it that every major car company has now created vehicles that run on hydrogen but are not allowed to put the vehicles on the market?
How did we exit the last 5 ice age's if there were no humans to cause the earth to warm up? I heard somewhere that the sun was somewhat warm but I think it's bull**** right-wing garbage.
We have exactly the same amount of water on the planet today as we had a few million years ago when the planet was first formed. All of our water is recycled, the glass you drank this morning was pizzed by a dinosaur a million years ago.
Water isn't going anywhere, unless obama signs an executive order...
Now with 7 billion people all needed vast amounts of it. So your point is not a real point at all.
We have exactly the same amount of water on the planet today as we had a few million years ago when the planet was first formed. All of our water is recycled, the glass you drank this morning was pizzed by a dinosaur a million years ago.
Water isn't going anywhere, unless obama signs an executive order...
Transfer of fresh water from lakes to oceans would be a bad thing.
Now with 7 billion people all needed vast amounts of it. So your point is not a real point at all.
And neither of you argued his statement, that is true, and instead brought up human population. If you think this planet can only sustain a few billion, you're nuts.
And neither of you argued his statement, that is true, and instead brought up human population. If you think this planet can only sustain a few billion, you're nuts.
The planet could sustain a high amount, but would they be happy?
Now with 7 billion people all needed vast amounts of it. So your point is not a real point at all.
His point is correct. Water is recycled, the water you drink is millions of years old. 7 billion people drink it, urinate, evaporate, condense, you then redrink, die, dehydrate, evaporation, condense, your kids drink you.
His point is correct. Water is recycled, the water you drink is millions of years old. 7 billion people drink it, urinate, evaporate, condense, you then redrink, die, dehydrate, evaporation, condense, your kids drink you.
Rep for the unfortunately necessary 3rd grade explanation.
If they're really interested in saving the planet, why don't they make more fuel efficient tires that require less (or zero) oil to make?
actually they already do.
Quote:
Why did they kill the electric car in the 60's, 70's and 80's?
perhaps because the populace at large doesnt want them. they have limited range and long recharge times.
Quote:
Why is it that every major car company has now created vehicles that run on hydrogen but are not allowed to put the vehicles on the market?
who says hydrogen powered vehicles are not allowed to be sold? no one has them on the market because there is NO infrastructure to handle them.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
