Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-19-2013, 05:59 PM
 
1,596 posts, read 1,158,930 times
Reputation: 178

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
Plyler v Doe = the justices stated that the 14th Amendment applied to everyone including illegal immigrants.
Just like the Brits, we began incorporating them as indirect impressment.

To the stork: Whatever lands in the U.S. stays in the U.S.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-19-2013, 05:59 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,048,770 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
When a foreigner migrates to a country illegally they aren't under that country's full jurisdiction aka allegience.
Get a freaking dictionary, allegiance is not a freaking synonym for freaking jurisdiction!

Quote:
Native Americans are full fledged U.S. citizens so what are you talking about?
Yeah, but not in 1866. The granting of American citizenship to native people didn't take place until the passage of the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924.

While you are looking for a dictionary, pick of a college level history book!

Is it just me who finds it so freaking ironic that those with the most patriotic sounding nicknames are the most ignorant of American history, the Constitution and the law?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2013, 06:03 PM
 
62,945 posts, read 29,141,740 times
Reputation: 18578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
What part of unless you are an Ambassador or a hostile enemy occupying US soil, you are are subject to our jurisdiction do you not grasp?

Are you an Ambassador? Are you occupying US SOil as an enemy combatant?

Are these immigrants Ambassadors? Are they occupying US soil as an enemy combatant?

If you answer no to any of these questions, then they are by definition, subject to our jurisdiction.


What you fail to understand is that IF they weren't, then by them being here ILLEGALLY or legally, they can do whatever they want, not follow our laws, AND CAN never be punished. NEVER. So they can murder, rape, and steal without recourse.
What part of illegal immigrants are also not subject to our jurisdiction aka allegience aren't you gettiing?

No, every foreigner in our country regardless of their status is subject to the punishment of our laws if caught breaking them. Its the same thing in every country and many countries do not allow birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants but they are still subject to punishment for breaking their laws. Are you really this dense?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2013, 06:03 PM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,271,551 times
Reputation: 1837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
I am not a birther.
Steve is a birther, and has thrown this issue in because it deals with citizenship and he loves to trot out the John Bingham quote while ignoring that there was an entire CONGRESS who help author the amendment.

Quote:
This is about the correct interpretation of the 14th Amendment on birthright citizenship not about Obama.
Don't know where you've been, but the correct interpretation of the 14th Amendment came out of the original debates from the 39th Congress.

Quote:
We must depend upon the general law relating to subject and citizens recognized by all nations for a definition, and that must lead to a conclusion that every person born in the United States is a natural born citizen of such States, except it may be that children born on our soil to temporary sojourners or representatives of foreign Governments are native born citizens of the United States. Thus it is expressed by a writer on the Constitution of the United States: "Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity." Rawle on the Constitution, pg. 86." Rep. Wilson. Cong. Globe, 39th Cong., lst Sess. 1117 (1866).
Quote:
You tell me then why you think that the qualifer of "AND subject to the jurisdiction", etc. was a part of the birthright citizenship clause.
ambassadors and enemy combatants occupying US Soil, that's why.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2013, 06:03 PM
 
Location: Los Awesome, CA
8,653 posts, read 6,133,169 times
Reputation: 3368
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
Did you read the bill? it is not meant to keep minorities out of our country. it is meant to correct the law that allows a woman to come to Americe, illegally, give birth and now her child is a citizen with all the rights of citizenship..Even receiving food stamps, WAC, etc. The original bill was meant to protect the children of slaves, it was not meant to give legal rights to a bunch of illegals kids. I have total respect for those who have come to America legally. Most of us, unless we are native Americans have come from other countries, but to continue the practice of allowing these kids all the rights, those who have worked hard to recieve get, is plain wrong in my opinion...Do you have any idea how much illegals are costing our country?

Will the bill pass? Probably not, at least not now, but eventually it may.
A bill wouldn't even be considered if it blatantly expressed racism. At least not in progressive areas. But there is no denying that something like this is directly pointed towards Mexican immigration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2013, 06:06 PM
 
1,596 posts, read 1,158,930 times
Reputation: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
Plyler v Doe = the justices stated that the 14th Amendment applied to everyone including illegal immigrants.
"Revisions to education laws in Texas in 1975 withheld state funds for educating children who had not been legally admitted to the United States and authorized local school districts to deny enrollment to such students. A 5-to-4 majority of the Supreme Court found that this policy was in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, as illegal immigrant children are people "in any ordinary sense of the term", and therefore had protection from discrimination unless a substantial state interest could be shown to justify it."

The 14th Amendment makes no mention of "people", as well it shouldn't, since "people" are incorporated as "persons" under it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plyler_v._Doe
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2013, 06:06 PM
 
62,945 posts, read 29,141,740 times
Reputation: 18578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
Plyler v Doe = the justices stated that the 14th Amendment applied to everyone including illegal immigrants.
No, it didn't in regards to birthright citizenship.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2013, 06:07 PM
 
5,705 posts, read 3,671,669 times
Reputation: 3907
Sounds good to me. Everyone born in the confederacy should pass a test anyways. The union won the war and he who wins writes the rules.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2013, 06:09 PM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,698,072 times
Reputation: 9980
Mitt Romneys father came here from Mexico, where he was born
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-19-2013, 06:10 PM
 
62,945 posts, read 29,141,740 times
Reputation: 18578
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Get a freaking dictionary, allegiance is not a freaking synonym for freaking jurisdiction!



Yeah, but not in 1866. The granting of American citizenship to native people didn't take place until the passage of the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924.

While you are looking for a dictionary, pick of a college level history book!

Is it just me who finds it so freaking ironic that those with the most patriotic sounding nicknames are the most ignorant of American history, the Constitution and the law?
I wondered how long it would take you to get around to be insulting and act like you are the expert on birthright citizenship when the qualifying word "AND" is staring you right in the face. Let's see, Ambassadors are not subject our jurisdiction but illegal immigrants are?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:44 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top