Obama only wants military leaders who will fire on US citizens (regular, conspiracy)

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

And today's visit from the Secret Service for making threats against the life of the President goes to....

...You.

You are the only one who mentioned "threats against the life of the president".

What are you talking about?

[hammertime33]

Originally Posted by doctorhugo

So how 'bout it mister hammertime, when are you going to factually debunk my OP?

What is there to debunk? Your OP contains nothing of substance - certainly nothing factual.

[stargazzer]

If society cannot demonstrate \ control in the continued violation of life, there is no justification to insist
that its members are refused the ability to do so.

It is immoral to suggest that the individual must be stripped down to 'less.. then what is known which
law and order cannot contain. To do so would be to strip the individuals duty and obligation and ability
to maintain the sanctity of life, which would be unethical.

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by hammertime33

What is there to debunk? Your OP contains nothing of substance - certainly nothing factual.

There is your opportunity. Explain why you believe their is "nothing of substance".

Surely you can do that, if your assertion is true.

(P.S - Hopefully you have read up and now know the difference between burglary and robbery).

[Mac_Muz]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

And today's visit from the Secret Service for making threats against the life of the President goes to....

I didn't make any threats to the president. First of all there is no current president, and 2ndly being arrested for Treason isn't in my personal power, but if it were he would have been arrested and tired long ago.

You ain't real bright are ya....

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by Mac_Muz

I didn't make any threats to the president.

I'm not the guy you're going to have to convince on that score. Save your excuses for the guys in the dark suits.

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by Mac_Muz

First of all there is no current president...

Huh?

What does this mean?

[Harrier]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

I'm not the guy you're going to have to convince on that score. Save your excuses for the guys in the dark suits.

Why don't you explain why you think that threats were made?

(Hint - they weren't).

The only one who mentioned threats was you.

[Mac_Muz]

Originally Posted by stargazzer

If society cannot demonstrate \ control in the continued violation of life, there is no justification to insist
that its members are refused the ability to do so.

It is immoral to suggest that the individual must be stripped down to 'less.. then what is known which
law and order cannot contain. To do so would be to strip the individuals duty and obligation and ability
to maintain the sanctity of life, which would be unethical.

Like abortion? I sure don't take the Democrats seriously when they banned God, killed ethics and morals and wipe out 1 to 2 million unborn every year....

Then they legalize gay sex which i find totally disgusting.....

Long before any one gets my guns, all gays will be locked up doing time.. Abortion will not be a common word and when it is herd people will shudder in disgust.

[IBMMuseum]

Originally Posted by Harrier

Don't you think that a president who considers American citizens to be a threat could be considered paranoid?

Don't you think that American citizens who consider a president to be a threat could be considered paranoid?