Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The GOP blames Clinton and Obama for ignoring requests for more security even though the House did not vote in favor of increased funding for extra security.
Bush ignored warnings about 9/11 which resulted in the biggest attack on American soil in the history of our country!
Quote:
On Aug. 6, 2001, President George W. Bush received a classified review of the threats posed by Osama bin Laden and his terrorist network, Al Qaeda. That morning’s “presidential daily brief” — the top-secret document prepared by America’s intelligence agencies — featured the now-infamous heading: “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.” A few weeks later, on 9/11, Al Qaeda accomplished that goal.
The GOP blames Clinton and Obama for ignoring requests for more security even though the House did not vote in favor of increased funding for extra security.
Are you even serious with this? You're going to compare the ambassador making a specific request for additional security for a specific building in war torn Libya and being denied to a generic intelligence warning that Al Qaeda may strike somewhere in the 3 million square miles of the continental United States before the war on terror ever started? Come on now.
The GOP blames Clinton and Obama for ignoring requests for more security even though the House did not vote in favor of increased funding for extra security.
Are you even serious with this? You're going to compare the ambassador making a specific request for additional security for a specific building in war torn Libya and being denied to a generic intelligence warning that Al Qaeda may strike somewhere in the 3 million square miles of the continental United States before the war on terror ever started? Come on now.
Why did the House decrease funding for such security measures by over 300 million in 2012?
I place no blame outside of those who initiated the violence in Benghazi. I do for the stupid, lame, utterly unbelievable excuse the administration came up with for the attack though.
The GOP blames Clinton and Obama for ignoring requests for more security even though the House did not vote in favor of increased funding for extra security.
That the Administration themselves testified that funding played no part months ago I'd say you are way behind on the news curve.
Let's talk about Hilary blowing off the fact that the Administration intentionally misled this Country after the attack and she does not care one iota about that at all (I guess you don't when you were a part of it).
Clinton had the opportunity to take him out and did not have a pair to actually go through with it. If he had Al Qaida would not have grown into what they have become. And 9/11 would not have happened.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
