Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That would be you God. I'm not forcing my God down your throat. That would not be right, to even try to control you.
You have your own choices to make.
You miss the point. You can't apply the same law to gay couples. You need to rewrite the law. Well if you can rewrite the law for gays why not for the polygamy?
I don't see why the law can't be applied to gay couples. Divorce courts will have a difficult time in deciding whih party to give kids to since there is no longer a man and woman, but this could force them to see divorce through gender neutral lens.
Polygamy is a bit more difficult though. How do you determine which wife is the next of kin, how is property division handled, or child support.
As I stated earlier, I have no problem abolishing marriage and letting people write their own contracts and just having courts enforce them.
I don't see why the law can't be applied to gay couples. Divorce courts will have a difficult time in deciding whih party to give kids to since there is no longer a man and woman, but this could force them to see divorce through gender neutral lens.
Polygamy is a bit more difficult though. How do you determine which wife is the next of kin, how is property division handled, or child support.
As I stated earlier, I have no problem abolishing marriage and letting people write their own contracts and just having courts enforce them.
Again, I am not here to debate how to change or apply the law. I am here to point out an irony. :-)
If you support one freedom, why don't you support another? Aren't they just the same? Marrying one person is fine but marrying two is a crime? Marrying opposite sex is fine but marrying same sex is not?
In the forming of the Ron Paul grassroots organizing, that got labelled the tea party in 2006, we we anything but war mongers such as JFK LBJ, Reagan, Clinton Obama, both Bush's, McCain and Romney, were and are.
JKF was very reluctant about foreign misadventures.
But, he was pressured by many covert homosexual hawks.
He ended up getting himself kilt over it.
Speaking of homosexual hawks, what's Turd Blossom doing these days?
I know that. I was thinking the post was about the hijacked Tea Party movement - the
one that included Palin and Ted Nugent and Rove and Bullwinkle - just in case anyone wasn't
paying attention
Dr Ron Paul isn't the only one who can not stand war. We are the party of the people
for peace. We are the Libertarian Party.
I share a lot of the concerns the tea party has, but I disagree on how we solve those problems.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
. 
