Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-04-2013, 08:19 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
YES! The OP does that with thread titles consistently!

i.e. Closing loopholes IS NOT the same as calling for new taxes, apparently a difficult concept for the thought challenged to grasp.
New taxes? That seems to be a bit of word play maybe. It is a call for new revenue. Maybe more get caught when you include those who are excluded now but all in all, I'm pretty sure the president will call for more than closing "loopholes".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-04-2013, 08:21 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
New taxes? That seems to be a bit of word play maybe. It is a call for new revenue. Maybe more get caught when you include those who are excluded now but all in all, I'm pretty sure the president will call for more than closing "loopholes".
Well if they remove credits and deductions that were once part of the tax code then those people affected would be paying new taxes wouldn't they ?

If they change rates on existing taxes than that's new additional tax on top of old isn't it ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2013, 08:23 AM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,222,878 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
YES! The OP does that with thread titles consistently!

i.e. Closing loopholes IS NOT the same as calling for new taxes, apparently a difficult concept for the thought challenged to grasp.
When the republicans offered to cut tax loop holes the dems went for rate increase. Now they want tax loopholes . The hypocrisy is apparent .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2013, 08:28 AM
 
Location: Currently I physically reside on the 3rd planet from the sun
2,220 posts, read 1,877,888 times
Reputation: 886
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
New taxes? That seems to be a bit of word play maybe. It is a call for new revenue. Maybe more get caught when you include those who are excluded now but all in all, I'm pretty sure the president will call for more than closing "loopholes".
Ah, new revenue!

I'm all for that.
Get off the backs of small business and regular Joes/Janes so we can create economic opportunities to generate revenues.

Unfortunately, when Obama says, 'new revenue' it typically means more tax warfare rhetoric to galvanize the stupid against the so-called rich to justify new programs and legislature to xfer wealth from the middle class to government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2013, 08:31 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwm1964 View Post
Ah, new revenue!

I'm all for that.
Get off the backs of small business and regular Joes/Janes so we can create economic opportunities to generate revenues.

Unfortunately, when Obama says, 'new revenue' it typically means more tax warfare rhetoric to galvanize the stupid against the so-called rich to justify new programs and legislature to xfer wealth from the middle class to government.
Well the new "rich" are the upper middle class.
$250K per year is rich, rich enough to be the target of all new taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2013, 08:39 AM
 
5,976 posts, read 15,271,663 times
Reputation: 6711
Default Lessen the impact?!

So he wants you to have not one, but two sticks of butter before bending over? Is that supposed to lessen the impact?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2013, 08:39 AM
 
Location: North Central Florida
6,218 posts, read 7,729,420 times
Reputation: 3939
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post

Closing loopholes and limiting deductions was what the Republicans said but when Obama says it, you are up in arms.

Another false outrage thread.

Nope, I think the outrage comes from the fact that when Obama says it, you know it wont happen. The master of lip service just parrots what his oponents say. One of the oldest tricks in the book to take the wind out of one's detractors sails.

Most know it all teen agers employ this trick on a daily basis.


He'll close loopholes, limit deductions, but just keep on spending at record levels.


YC.......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2013, 08:42 AM
 
1,291 posts, read 2,895,331 times
Reputation: 1264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.XXX View Post
Our dear marxist leader on his way in transforming American into socialist state...

Obama...spending cuts...yea right...lol..lol...lol...lol...lol...everytime he lies his ears get bigger!!!...maybe I should start calling him dumbo..

Attachment 107059

Obama Says U.S. Needs Revenue Along With Spending Cuts - Bloomberg
History will not speak kindly of barry.
Personally I can't wait until he is history, hopefully sooner than later!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2013, 08:49 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,855,263 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
When the republicans offered to cut tax loop holes the dems went for rate increase. Now they want tax loopholes . The hypocrisy is apparent .
What hypocrisy? The Dems always wanted rate increases and cutting loopholes. Not only that, cutting long range spending in entitlements and defense, lest you conveniently forget.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2013, 08:52 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,678,440 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
We are 16 trillion and counting in debt. To address that some of it will have to be increased revenue's. I'm O.K. with that as long as there are cuts to go along with it.
Too much spending is the issue, not loss in revenue. Obama just wants to tax and spend, he has even stated that "we don't have a spending problem."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:25 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top