Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-05-2013, 07:51 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,354,108 times
Reputation: 4113

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bideshi View Post
He would have told the couple to repent, and go and sin no more.
How were they sinning? Buying a weddng cake is a sin now?

 
Old 02-05-2013, 07:54 AM
 
16,433 posts, read 22,154,382 times
Reputation: 9622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymax View Post
How were they sinning? Buying a weddng cake is a sin now?
Homosexual activity is a sin, but we've already had this circular conversation before. Go on sinning and believing in sin, but judgment will come to who refuse to acknowledge their sins and repent.
 
Old 02-05-2013, 07:54 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,354,108 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bideshi View Post
He's probably wearing a polyester/cotton blend too, but Christian's are not under the OT law. But, of course, being a person knowledgeable about these things, you already knew that.
No, bigoted Christians just pull out the OT when it suits them and ignore it when it doesn't.
However, lesbians are not mentioned in either the OT or the NT.
 
Old 02-05-2013, 07:57 AM
miu
 
Location: MA/NH
17,765 posts, read 40,091,372 times
Reputation: 18068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymax View Post
Members of the KKK are not a protected class.

Perhaps this will make it clearer:

Protected class is a term used in United States anti-discrimination law.[1] The term describes characteristics or factors which cannot be targeted for discrimination and harassment. The following characteristics are considered "Protected Classes" and persons cannot be discriminated against based on these characteristics:Some states like Oregon include sexual orientation as a protected class.

Protected class - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So isn't this just a battle between two "protected classes"? And it's "religion" versus "sexual orientation". After all, one can use "religion" to opt out of participating in Obamacare.
 
Old 02-05-2013, 07:59 AM
 
17,842 posts, read 14,354,108 times
Reputation: 4113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bideshi View Post
Homosexual activity is a sin.
Buying a cake is 'homosexual activity'?


Nothing about lesbian 'activities' in the Bible anyway.

Were they male temple prostitutes? Were they heterosexual males wanting to rape male strangers? Were they using ritual sex acts to worship pagan fertility gods in a temple? That's the only type of 'homosexual activity' mentioned in the Bible. Nothing at all about homosexuals, especially female homosexuals.
 
Old 02-05-2013, 08:01 AM
 
Location: San Antonio Texas
11,431 posts, read 18,964,165 times
Reputation: 5224
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymax View Post
Tatoos are an "abomination unto the Lord". I notice this baker has a tattoo on his arm. Rather hypocritical of him isn't it?



http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/oreg..._wedding_cake/


However lesbians are not even mentioned in the Bible at all.

Why is that we see some "Christians" using religious beliefs as an excuse to discriminate against others, when they don't even know what the Bible does or doesn't say?
I had to google this:

Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD.
Leviticus 19:28


That guy is yet another christian hypocrite.
 
Old 02-05-2013, 08:07 AM
 
16,433 posts, read 22,154,382 times
Reputation: 9622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaymax View Post
Buying a cake is 'homosexual activity'?


Nothing about lesbian 'activities' in the Bible anyway.

Were they male temple prostitutes? Were they heterosexual males wanting to rape male strangers? Were they using ritual sex acts to worship pagan fertility gods in a temple? That's the only type of 'homosexual activity' mentioned in the Bible. Nothing at all about homosexuals, especially female homosexuals.
ROMANS 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
 
Old 02-05-2013, 08:08 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,321,515 times
Reputation: 27718
Calm down folks. The law is on the side of gay people here.
Go google other wedding incidents and you'll see the court rules in favor of the gay couple a good majority of the time and the other side is penalized and fined. Several have been driven out of business because of the hefty penalties as they are all small business.

Those with strong religious beliefs will be driven out of business..one lawsuit at a time.
 
Old 02-05-2013, 08:10 AM
 
16,433 posts, read 22,154,382 times
Reputation: 9622
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post

Those with strong religious beliefs will be driven out of business..one lawsuit at a time.
Yes, regretably.
 
Old 02-05-2013, 08:43 AM
 
Location: Tampa (by way of Omaha)
14,561 posts, read 23,012,670 times
Reputation: 10356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bideshi View Post
ROMANS 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: 1:27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
Education. You should get some.

Quote:
Proposition 6: The one passage in the New Testament that almost certainly does refer to homosexuality is based on some highly debatable presuppositions about its nature and causes.
The passage in question is Romans 1:26–27. Earlier in this chapter, the author is talking about idolatry, the worship of false gods. Then, beginning in verse 24, he talks about the results of idolatry. Verses 24 and 25 identify the results of idolatry as lust, impurity, and the degrading of one’s body. Then, verses 26 and 27 spell out in more detail the nature of this lust, impurity, and bodily degradation as follows (New Revised Standard Version):

For this reason God gave them up to degrading passions. Their women exchanged natural intercourse for unnatural, and in the same way also the men, giving up natural intercourse with women, were consumed with passion for one another. Men committed shameless acts with men and received in their own persons the due penalty for their error.


Following verses 26 and 27, the remainder of the chapter lists some of the other results of idolatry, and the list is rather similar to the catalogues in 1 Corinthians 6:9–10 and 1 Timothy 1:8–11. In other words, homosexuality is but one among other types of unacceptable behaviors.

What must be emphasized, then, is that the passage, taken as a whole, is not about homosexuality. It is about idolatry. The only reason it mentions homosexuality at all is because the author assumes that it is a result of willful idolatry. Knowing full well that there is one true God, people nevertheless freely choose to worship false gods. As punishment for this idolatry, God “gives them up” to homosexual activity. Thus, in a sense, homosexuality is not so much a sin as it is a punishment for sin. This should mean, however, that no monotheist would ever take part in homosexual activity—no practicing Jew or Christian or Muslim. Only worshippers of false gods would engage in such activity. This was a fairly common assumption within first-century Judaism, and it is one of the dubious presuppositions that underlie Romans 1:26–27. Clearly, however, it is not consistent with what we can observe in the world around us.
More in the link.

What the New Testament Says about Homosexuality
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:35 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top