Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Gun huggers get more than a tingle down their leg. Think alternative to Viagra....
You say this only because you are a good little sheeple......that's what every other leftist anti gun person says....
And, why is the left so infatuated about sex? Viagra, huggers, bagging, maybe you people need to see a psychiatrist...or hooker and take care of some of that pent up frustration....
Here is the big difference ******* gun grabbers. Had there been a security guard with an AR15 confronting Lanza like this situation most likely it would have turned out differently. But that is a hard bitter pill for you to swallow now isn't it.
True, but liberals will never allow children to see with their own eyes that what stands between them and psychos is a firearm in the hands of a responsible adult.
It just sends the wrong message to impressionable minds they are working hard to mold into the next generation of unquestioning sheep.
Liberals would rather allow children to be murdered than to have the effectiveness of their propaganda mills compromised by truth.
You say this only because you are a good little sheeple......that's what every other leftist anti gun person says....
And, why is the left so infatuated about sex? Viagra, huggers, bagging, maybe you people need to see a psychiatrist...or hooker and take care of some of that pent up frustration....
Is that what every other leftist anti gun person says? Because I made it up myself. I had no idea I had such a following.
Is that what every other leftist anti gun person says? Because I made it up myself. I had no idea I had such a following.
Thanks for letting me know that.
Haha, you really think you just thought that up....it has been said, by anti gun personnel, is it all over the internet/news....nope....but you are NOT the first....no need to flatter yourself...
Yea, mass murders of Newtown and Aurora are 'local stories" whilst a shootout that killed no one should be national news because it gives gun huggers a tingle down their leg.
Okay....
The really sad part is they have successfully brainwashed you and you believe all there crap. Wake up and think for yourself.
The really sad part is they have successfully brainwashed you and you believe all there crap. Wake up and think for yourself.
No one has brainwashed me. I do think for myself. I am neither anti gun or pro gun, I am simply in favor of common sense being used to dictate who, and how, guns are sold to the general public.
Gun laws, be they background checks, a Federal database, or required proficiency training should be part and parcel of the privilege of owning a firearm.
Those are my thoughts and beliefs, not someone elses. And they are based on common sense, the number of gun fatalities in this country, and the easy access to firearms in America. I am not in favor of banning AR-15's or other semi automatic rifles, however, they should only be sold to people who have proven they are responsible and qualified enough to own them.
No one has brainwashed me. I do think for myself. I am neither anti gun or pro gun, I am simply in favor of common sense being used to dictate who, and how, guns are sold to the general public.
Gun laws, be they background checks, a Federal database, or required proficiency training should be part and parcel of the privilege of owning a firearm.
Those are my thoughts and beliefs, not someone elses. And they are based on common sense, the number of gun fatalities in this country, and the easy access to firearms in America. I am not in favor of banning AR-15's or other semi automatic rifles, however, they should only be sold to people who have proven they are responsible and qualified enough to own them.
Again, simply common sense.
Then what does attempting to ban a thumb hole stock do?
What does banning all magazines that hold more than 7 rounds (in NY) and 10 in other states do?
What does banning a gun that has a "lug" to put a knife on the end of your rifle do?
What does a pistol grip have to do with the lethality of a gun?
What does the folding of a stock have to do with the lethality of a gun?
What does a telescoping stock have to do with the lethality of a gun?
What does a threaded barrel have to do with the lethality of a gun?
What does a detachable stock have to do with the lethality of a gun?
You say you are common sense and not pro/anti gun, this only leads me to believe that you know nothing about guns and have no desire to.
And why did you use the word "DICTATE" in your response?
No one has brainwashed me. I do think for myself. I am neither anti gun or pro gun, I am simply in favor of common sense being used to dictate who, and how, guns are sold to the general public.
Gun laws, be they background checks, a Federal database, or required proficiency training should be part and parcel of the privilege of owning a firearm.
Those are my thoughts and beliefs, not someone elses. And they are based on common sense, the number of gun fatalities in this country, and the easy access to firearms in America. I am not in favor of banning AR-15's or other semi automatic rifles, however, they should only be sold to people who have proven they are responsible and qualified enough to own them.
Again, simply common sense.
Then you need to educate yourself on world history. Because then you would not be in favor of registration for gun owners or a federal database. Registration leads to confiscation. There is so much proof to back that up.
Read about what happened to the Armenians and other christian populations in turkey after they had gun registration in 1911.
And I can see you are just repeating what you hear as far as "the number of gun fatalities". Because they are not that high compared to many other ways of people dying.
And who is to decide if I am responsible enough to own an AR-15?
Read up on history, you will definitely change your way of thinking.
Then you need to educate yourself on world history. Because then you would not be in favor of registration for gun owners or a federal database. Registration leads to confiscation. There is so much proof to back that up.
Read about what happened to the Armenians and other christian populations in turkey after they had gun registration in 1911.
And I can see you are just repeating what you hear as far as "the number of gun fatalities". Because they are not that high compared to many other ways of people dying.
And who is to decide if I am responsible enough to own an AR-15?
Read up on history, you will definitely change your way of thinking.
I know plenty about history, and not just 20th Century history, either.
We, as a nation, spend something like 8 times on defense what the rest of the world combined does. If you think your collection of AR-15's is going to protect you from the government, you are sorely mistaken. As well as being outgunned.
If, and when, the Federal govt. decides to come gunning for its own citizens, you can bet all the assault rifles in the world won't be any match for what the govt. has at its disposal.
The real way to protect your civil liberties and freedom from the Federal govt. is to reduce the size of its arsenal, and that means cutting defense spending. There is simply no need, no practical purpose, to keep a bloated defense budget taking yours and mine tax dollars, and the jobs it provides could be instead going towards something that benefits this country and this world, unlike a menacing military that invents reasons to invade and occupy other nations.
Then what does attempting to ban a thumb hole stock do?
beats me
What does banning all magazines that hold more than 7 rounds (in NY) and 10 in other states do?
decreases capacity to kill large numbers of people in crowded places by making shooter reload
What does banning a gun that has a "lug" to put a knife on the end of your rifle do?
nothing
What does a pistol grip have to do with the lethality of a gun?
increases portability is my guess, as well as greater firing control
What does the folding of a stock have to do with the lethality of a gun?
increases ability to conceal
What does a telescoping stock have to do with the lethality of a gun?
see above
What does a threaded barrel have to do with the lethality of a gun?
attaching a flash suppressor?
What does a detachable stock have to do with the lethality of a gun?
increases ability to conceal
You say you are common sense and not pro/anti gun, this only leads me to believe that you know nothing about guns and have no desire to.
I know a little, but less than your average gun hugger.
And why did you use the word "DICTATE" in your response?
Would you rather I said "DETERMINE"?
These are some reasons, I suppose
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
