Why is it when Liberals want to use the 94 CB... (weapons, treason)

[hoooka]

Lets see, when the libs want to use the 94 crime bill they will say we had and Assault weapons ban and it worked, then they will say the ban had a lot of holes in it we need to plug. Which is it liberal bleeding hearts, did the 94 crime bill work or not? You can't have it both ways. I know you want to have your cake and eat it too but you can't, this is the real world not Liberal heaven.

Here is My Sporting rifle I bought that was made during the CB. Its a 1996 Colt.

It has the horrible bayonet lug removed.

[Art123]

Originally Posted by hoooka

Lets see, when the libs want to use the 94 crime bill they will say we had and Assault weapons ban and it worked, then they will say the ban had a lot of holes in it we need to plug. Which is it liberal bleeding hearts, did the 94 crime bill work or not? You can't have it both ways. I know you want to have your cake and eat it too but you can't, this is the real world not Liberal heaven.

Here is My Sporting rifle I bought that was made during the CB. Its a 1996 Colt.

It has the horrible bayonet lug removed.

Uh, those aren't mutually exclusive ideas.

You can have something that works, AND have it work even better.

A Model-T works. A Prius works even better.

[hoooka]

Originally Posted by Art123

Uh, those aren't mutually exclusive ideas.

You can have something that works, AND have it work even better.

A Model-T works. A Prius works even better.

The point is While E. that it did not work. It did not work at all. I bought two of my AKs and one of my ARs under the Crime bill. The point is poindexter that I bought mags and guns that worked the same as the guns banned, and the only difference being that they did not have a flash suppressor, [which is for nothing more than keeping a shooter from being temporally blinded by flash in night battle] and a bayonet lug which no one uses anyway.

The point is that many liberals who know nothing about guns, will use it as a way to say look crime went down and its due to the CB. It was not due to the CB. All these guns were still made with some modifications, they kept rolling off the assembly lines. So which is it, did it work or not? If gun crime went down it was not due to the CB. Not at all. Its a lie you want to use because you have crap to back you up.

[Art123]

Originally Posted by hoooka

The point is While E. that it did not work. It did not work at all. I bought two of my AKs and one of my ARs under the Crime bill. The point is poindexter that I bought mags and guns that worked the same as the guns banned, and the only difference being that they did not have a flash suppressor, [which is for nothing more than keeping a shooter from being temporally blinded by flash in night battle] and a bayonet lug which no one uses anyway.

The point is that many liberals who know nothing about guns, will use it as a way to say look crime went down and its due to the CB. It was not due to the CB. All these guns were still made with some modifications, they kept rolling off the assembly lines. So which is it, did it work or not? If gun crime went down it was not due to the CB. Not at all. Its a lie you want to use because you have crap to back you up.

Sounds like you're making the point that the ban needed to be stricter.

Your logic is extremely flawed. There's no either/or situation, despite how many times you repeat it.

Something can be effective, AND be made more effective. Is that hard to understand?

[KUchief25]

DOJ study says gun ban won't have any effect on gun violence. Liberals are all just a bunch of tyrants and liars. They should all be jailed for treason.