Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-21-2013, 04:29 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,181,556 times
Reputation: 17209

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
You are not comprehending what is being said. It would:

1. Remove loopholes which pick winners and losers
2. Lower corporate tax for all corporations
3. Remove subsidies

How does that translate to "strictly raising revenue" to you? This is a conservative proposal.
The first two deal strictly with revenue and the last one is not being promoted by the Dems or Obama. I am happy to read them if I have missed them.

All the same we can not address the 17 trillion with businesses when that is nowhere near where most of the shortfall is coming from.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-21-2013, 04:34 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,975 posts, read 47,611,572 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
The first two deal strictly with revenue and the last one is not being promoted by the Dems or Obama. I am happy to read them if I have missed them.

All the same we can not address the 17 trillion with businesses when that is nowhere near where most of the shortfall is coming from.
No one is saying this one thing would solve all problems. I offered it as an example of something both sides have proposed, and would have a good chance of passing. If politicians insist on fighting fights they know they cannot win, then then its a losing game, and they are simply wasting everyones time. The politicians do not have the best of the nation in their minds, they only care about trying to score points for next elections.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 04:40 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,073,700 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
So, you're basically celebrating intentional lies from the President as well as pervasive ignorance in the general public......all for political gain?

I expect nothing less from an Obama voter. Trust me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
Yep he is a political genius who never takes any responsibility for anything he does,But being politically a genius does not make it any less of a lie to blame republicans for things his team proposed
I guess when you're getting your ass kicked, all you have left is the whining.

He is politically shredding the Republicans, and "political gain" here actually means accomplishing exactly what the American people elected him to accomplish. Never before has the Republican party looked more confused, impotent and irrelevant. And yes, suck it up. They've already gotten the blame.

Hear that? It's the death rattle of a political party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 04:49 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,073,700 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Again, it's ignorance.
Face it. You lost and continue to lose.

Maybe you're not quite as smart as you think you are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 04:52 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,181,556 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
No one is saying this one thing would solve all problems. I offered it as an example of something both sides have proposed, and would have a good chance of passing. If politicians insist on fighting fights they know they cannot win, then then its a losing game, and they are simply wasting everyones time. The politicians do not have the best of the nation in their minds, they only care about trying to score points for next elections.
I'll note that you didn't provide any of these cuts you say are being proposed.

Now if you are saying that this is the venue you think we should pursue, it won't come anywhere close to addressing our problem. The military and entitlements have to be cut.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 04:58 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,975 posts, read 47,611,572 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I'll note that you didn't provide any of these cuts you say are being proposed.

Now if you are saying that this is the venue you think we should pursue, it won't come anywhere close to addressing our problem. The military and entitlements have to be cut.
I don't want to repeat what I just said. Could you read my post again, specifically the part where I said it would not solve all problems, and it is just one an example of an idea which would have high probability of passing because both parties have supported it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 05:19 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,181,556 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
I don't want to repeat what I just said. Could you read my post again, specifically the part where I said it would not solve all problems, and it is just one an example of an idea which would have high probability of passing because both parties have supported it.
Thanking a war hero would have a high probability of passing also but it doesn't address our problem.

As I said the tax code is another issue. It may be somewhat related but we are talking about our debt and the sequester. Your points are things I may even agree with but they are not things that are going to stop the sequester.

The government has also had a year to agree on these things and haven't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 05:29 PM
 
Location: Where they serve real ale.
7,242 posts, read 7,905,533 times
Reputation: 3497
Republicans spent all their time pushing for these cuts and now that they're happening they're trying to pretend as if it had nothing to do with them. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so tragic.

It's pretty clear they're still trying to crash the economy but are desperately afraid of the political blow back from their actions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 05:32 PM
 
Location: Florida
76,975 posts, read 47,611,572 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Thanking a war hero would have a high probability of passing also but it doesn't address our problem.

As I said the tax code is another issue. It may be somewhat related but we are talking about our debt and the sequester. Your points are things I may even agree with but they are not things that are going to stop the sequester.

The government has also had a year to agree on these things and haven't.
There is no one silver bullet to fix all problems, but the removal of deductions, loopholes and subsidies is exactly the kind of thing they should be looking at. Subsidies eat up a lot of cash. BILLIONS. You seem to disagree for the sake of disagreeing, which of course is also the root cause of the gridlock in Congress too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 05:38 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,220,491 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
It's a game of chess. Republicans need to think of a counter move. There are many proposals which both parties seem to like, and the GOP just need to swallow their pride and agree with them. Think about removing corporate loopholes and subsidies for example. Why would they not agree with that, when they have made the same proposal themselves?
Yes the house passed two proposals to avoid the sequester senate would not take them up. The sequester was Obama team baby,Now politically he has the power of the MSM who will accept his lies and blame the republicans. Politically he has more Teflon on him then Reagan .It still does not make him anything but a liar who takes no responsibility for his own actions and tries to blame everyone else for his mess. Sice you will not name what loopholes you wish to cut i can not say if i agree or disagree
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top