Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-21-2013, 08:32 PM
 
Location: Del Rio, TN
39,869 posts, read 26,503,175 times
Reputation: 25770

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by newenglandgirl View Post
57 Terrible Consequences of the Sequester - ABC News

All cuts to the poor and homeless, not a dime from corporate welfare.
The bulk of the cuts are to defense....you don't consider any defense spending as "corporate welfare"?

Bring it on...we need to cut spending in all areas. Keep in mind of course that these are cuts in increases in spending...not actual cuts from what they currently get.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-21-2013, 08:41 PM
 
5,261 posts, read 4,155,515 times
Reputation: 2264
Quote:
Originally Posted by parfleche View Post
It is not cutting gov spending it is cutting increased spending which will still increase
Right, that's exactly what we want to be doing right now, reducing the rate of growth in federal spending because if we reduce the rate of growth, that money will go to the rich, er, job creators, who will put the money into the economy by infusing capital into their businesses and hiring more people and raising the salaries of those they already employ. It's just plain as day in the historical record that this is the way to go, correct?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 08:42 PM
 
5,261 posts, read 4,155,515 times
Reputation: 2264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
The bulk of the cuts are to defense....you don't consider any defense spending as "corporate welfare"?

Bring it on...we need to cut spending in all areas. Keep in mind of course that these are cuts in increases in spending...not actual cuts from what they currently get.
Can you explain the data that supports the view that cutting spending will benefit the economy within the current context?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 08:45 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,617,602 times
Reputation: 18521
I like Rand Paul's stand on the deal.
It needed to be more, instead of just the annual automatic increases in agency budgets.
Nothing will change. Nothing. I repeat, NOTHING.

Call Obama's bluff.


Seems the Tea Party put the chips on the table with the tax increase and called Obama's bluff.

LOVE IT!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 08:49 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,480,794 times
Reputation: 9618
the sequester amounts to 83 billion in cuts.....to a 3.8 trillion dollar budget


we need DEEPER CUTS
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 08:50 PM
 
8,891 posts, read 5,369,571 times
Reputation: 5696
It's God-awful ...... makes you wonder why BO approved it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 08:51 PM
 
Location: Columbus, OH
3,038 posts, read 2,513,553 times
Reputation: 831
Quote:
Originally Posted by cometclear View Post
Right, that's exactly what we want to be doing right now, reducing the rate of growth in federal spending because if we reduce the rate of growth, that money will go to the rich, er, job creators, who will put the money into the economy by infusing capital into their businesses and hiring more people and raising the salaries of those they already employ. It's just plain as day in the historical record that this is the way to go, correct?
The money that is going to be spent in the rate of growth does not exist. We have to print it first.

Even if it did exist it would be much better if it were in the private sector.

Private sector people spend money based on economic decisions which tend to benefit everyone.

Politicians spend money based on political decisions which tend to have zero economic benefit to anyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 09:02 PM
 
6,500 posts, read 6,036,001 times
Reputation: 3603
You have to be insane or complicit to believe a word from anyone who pushes the scare tactics. Its a bunch of bull.

This country is in trouble, for sure, but not because of needed cuts. We haven't had a budget in how long now? This administration thinks our debt is just a joke, and we are going to face the consequences sooner and later.

The bottom line is when have a lot of work to so to deal with debt and our economy. But as far as the sequester scare tactics, anyone with a brain and looks at the facts that the media refuses to spell out, knows its a bunch if bs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 09:06 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,947,486 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by newenglandgirl View Post
57 Terrible Consequences of the Sequester - ABC News

All cuts to the poor and homeless, not a dime from corporate welfare.
I will feel the effects next week when I take a business trip. TSA estimates the increase in time because of reduced staff will be an additional 5 hrs to go through security. Thanks boehner.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 09:07 PM
 
Location: Maryland
7,814 posts, read 6,391,086 times
Reputation: 9974
These are the people that accuse Republicans of using scare tactics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top