Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-25-2013, 08:32 AM
 
Location: Columbus, OH
3,038 posts, read 2,513,842 times
Reputation: 831

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
It may be about Obama and his wife but its creation by right wing hypocrisy is galringly evident.
It's not anymore glaring than the hypocrisy by the left on the exact same issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-25-2013, 08:33 AM
 
Location: Texas
9,189 posts, read 7,600,003 times
Reputation: 7801
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
Do these two people think we need to see their smiling faces on the TV in our living rooms every day?
You rather they be frowning? And btw, if you think they are in your face everyday then the best solution is to turn off your tv and go read a book or something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2013, 08:34 AM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,705,895 times
Reputation: 8798
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioRules View Post
I didn't apologize?

Why would I. I did nothing wrong.
Rationalize your error away in your own mind, if you wish. It reflects as poorly on your comments as your earlier excessive political bias reflected on your comments.

Let's see what your next evasion of responsibility for what you posted will be...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2013, 08:35 AM
 
3,448 posts, read 3,132,726 times
Reputation: 478
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
It may be about Obama and his wife but its creation by right wing hypocrisy is galringly evident.

copycats arn't for real
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2013, 08:36 AM
 
Location: CHicago, United States
6,933 posts, read 8,493,925 times
Reputation: 3510
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
Right. Because we're all a bunch of racists.
If that's how you choose to be identified, fine with me. It wasn't as if I had a lingering question in the first place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2013, 08:42 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
Do these two people think we need to see their smiling faces on the TV in our living rooms every day? They act as if they were pop stars, and think their fans can't see enough of them.

Michelle Obama - unprecedented appearance on Oscars

and last week:

Michelle Obama dances with Jimmy Fallon - CNN.com


Don't politicians know that they are elected to act as public servants, and their families are not pop stars, and we work hard for the money that is used to fly them around the country. An entourage of fifty people prob follow the First Lady around, it's not free.


The Obama's seem be taking that old saying to heart, that politics is Hollywood show business for unattractive people. Jetting off to Hawaiian vacation in December, then off to Aspen and Palm City in February. I'm guessing these two are only just getting started. Over the next four years they will be having a blast, hobnobbing with pop stars and millionaire celebrities, and vacationing all over the world on our dime. All during what Obama calls "the worst economy since the Great Depression."
I'm trying to feel your pain. But then, not being a teenage girl, "pop star" or "rock star" is not the first thing that comes to my mind when I see President Barack Hussein Obama or First Lady Michelle Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2013, 08:44 AM
 
3,448 posts, read 3,132,726 times
Reputation: 478
hey mcsquare ! .....what happened to the keen imaginary process for understanding...a little base a yuh have yourself some good rap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2013, 08:44 AM
 
3,620 posts, read 3,836,149 times
Reputation: 1512
i thought the right hated shows like this. whining about this just shows where the right is at this point in time
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2013, 08:46 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,678,440 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
Reagan and Bush made up for the "economy" of vacationing on the ranch through volume:

All The President’s Vacations | Politicol News

"The bill for his one month long vacation $ 600,298.00 which was a lot of money 25 years ago. ... The Reagan’s visited their ranch in the Santa Ynez Mountains of California three times a year costing taxpayers 8 million dollars per year."
Like i said, I don't expect ignorant sycophants to use common sense. If the Obamas do something it's ignored, not even given the time of day, if republicans do anything, it must be analyzed, itemized and vilified.

If any president was telling us we need to sacrifice, raised our taxes, slapped new fees on just about everything we purchased, and then went about living like a spoiled trust fund baby, I'd be in his face about it.

The Bush or Reagan ranches took very little security to keep the first Family safe. The location and property had already been screened, security details prearranged from previous visits, assets like phone lines, satellite links, cameras, sensors and contingency plans are reused. It's a case of 'been there, done that.'

As opposed to the Obama's, oft times going on multiple separate vacations. There preference for trips to new locations in exposed, public places is very costly and resource intensive. The advance security teams and dozens of security people, equipment, jet aircraft, helicopters and vehicles that are sent ahead of time, costing hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars, all by themselves.

Then there is the coordination between secret service and local law enforcement, the cost burden absorbed by the local community for additional security from local law enforcement, the areas with restricted access to the public, the road closings, detours and disruptions to businesses and employees, all cost hundreds of thousands to the local communities.

Sorry, but Reagan going to his ranch was many times cheaper.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2013, 08:48 AM
bUU
 
Location: Florida
12,074 posts, read 10,705,895 times
Reputation: 8798
So you'd like to think. Of course, being as politically biased against the President as you are, your dictating your opinion as if it is fact means very little.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top