Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There's only one problem with Paul's filibuster, and that is he is protesting a non-issue. Holder has plainly stated that the Obama administration would not use a drone (or any other military equipment) to take out an American simply walking around. He has also stated that the president would use military equipment on US soil under highly improbable circumstances, such as a military invasion by a foreign country. There's really nothing controversial to this, it's just another "OMG DRONES!" hissy fits that some people have been throwing.
No, it is about Paul wanting to protect our liberties.
No, it is about Paul wanting to protect our liberties.
Imagine that, the son of a radical racist wanting to protect our liberties. That is a new twist I thought I'd never, ever read. I'm seeing a chip off the old racist block in Rand Paul.
Oh, you're just mad cause Holder was caught holding his little weeny
I'm sorry - did you say whiney
I celebrate Rand Paul's or anyone else's voice in regards to this important issue.
"Every word decides a question between power and liberty." - James Madison
Well said!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.