Why are certain people against the idea of ownership of profit?

[mmmjv]

Originally Posted by TheHurricaneKid

No, it's the opposite.

The IRS does not audit avoidance, therefore it's lawful and there is nothing wrong with it.

So what if the rich avoid taxes?

So what if they grow their money in the Cayman islands?

So what if the single mom applying for welfare transfers her bank account to somebody else's name?
So what if unions go in strike and close down the business to get more money?
So what if the poor avoid taxes? By not voting for people, like Herman Cain, who would raise their taxes?

[kidkaos2]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

Because corporations are making record profits, and there are not enough jobs.

Why else?

But they link the two together, as if corporations have a responsibility to provide jobs.

[petch751]

Originally Posted by J746NEW

If you make those profits by buddying up with the government to put you at the head of the line above everyone else, then you don't deserve it.

There is one such glaring example of the Billionaires at 740 Park Avenue in New York City.
Bush and Romney both paid a visit to some of these billionaires personally for campaign donations.
In return, legislation is written to benefit them. That is not free market capitalism at work.

I notice many on this board spout about Capitalism and Free Markets, but yet then turn around and support the buying of politicians to rig the game in their favor.
It is all lies and propaganda. They don't really support it.

And no mention of George Soros? Of course not, to do so would make your argument debunked.

[petch751]

Originally Posted by mmmjv

Are you serious????? First of all the "if the IRS does not audit them" leads me to believe that you think tax avoidance is against the law. Do you? (It's not, it's tax evasion that's against the law)

then again it is legal to claim to be unable to work and soak other Americans to feed and pay your way. Its an abused system called welfare.