Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The fossil record contains fossils of only complete and fully-formed species. There are no fossils of partially-evolved species to indicate that a gradual process of evolution ever occurred. Even among evolutionists there are diametrically different interpretations and reconstructions of the fossils used to support human evolution from a supposed ape-like ancestry.
Even if evolution takes millions and millions of years, we should still be able to see some stages of its process. But, we simply don't observe any partially-evolved fish, frogs, lizards, birds, dogs, cats among us. Every species of plant and animal is complete and fully-formed.
Another problem is how could partially-evolved plant and animal species survive over millions of years when their basic organs and tissues were still in the process of evolving? How, for example, were animals breathing, eating, and reproducing if there respiratory, digestive, and reproductive organs were still evolving?
The fact that animal and plant species are found fully formed and complete in the fossil record is powerful evidence (although not proof) for creation because it is evidence that they came into existence as fully formed and complete which is not possible by evolution. This is only possible with creation.
I am guessing that you did not major in science in college.
You cannot relegate the creator of the universe to a particular place or time.
Besides - we aren't discussing whether God should be taught about in public schools, we are discussing whether evolution should be taught in public schools.
Oddly, many evolution supporters seem unable to grasp that concept, and hence keep going off topic.
What does your God think about evolution being taught in public schools?
Interesting. I read that there was probably some breading between some of these species, especially neanderthal man (though if they could breed then I guess they were not of different species after all). It is interesting how quickly man evolved. That's why I think the theory of how evolution happens needs work. I suspect it has more a more exacting mechanism than a series of random mutations, sex selection and genetic drift.
Microevolution is observable and actually happens.
Macroevolution is not observable and does not actually occur.
Remember when the church called Galileo a heretic and would not allow his theory that the earth revolved around the sun to be taught? The church believed the sun revolved around the earth because that was what they "observed" as well as those who wrote about it in the bible.
That the Law of Evolution is NOT true - That CRAP!!!
There is no law of evolution - so your inane comment is meaningless.
It amazes me how so many people can be so completely deluded as to believe in such a ridiculous idea such as theory of evolution.
It rightfully boggles the mind of actual rational thinkers.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
