Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Actually yes, it is her right to film in public and there's nothing you can do about it.
She can have her ugly a__ sued for lying online about a private citizen and their medical condition. Hopefully, she will be. That should stop sailor "grandma."
Yes, but right wingers feel a sense of entitlement about attacking non-right wingers. They feel they have the right.
I'm afraid you have it backwards - some on the left, like you, feel a sense of entitlement to attack anyone with a differing opinion from yours. YOU have proven me correct bunches of times.
I'm afraid you have it backwards - some on the left, like you, feel a sense of entitlement to attack anyone with a differing opinion from yours. YOU have proven me correct bunches of times.
The idiots on the left and the idiots on the right are both idiots.
She can have her ugly a__ sued for lying online about a private citizen and their medical condition. Hopefully, she will be. That should stop sailor "grandma."
Nope, sorry, try again. The 2 party consent applies to wiretap laws which specifically pertains to audio recording only. An example would be a phone conversation. Now if the camera was hidden and there was a conversation then ok, but that isn't what happened.
Why do you keep peddling this false information. The audio function in videotaping is also subject to the stringent audio-related regulations in a two-party consent state. Here's a lay-person's explanation for you:
"While 37 U.S. states allow for one-party consent to covert audio recording, twelve states have laws to prevent audio recordings persons without their express knowledge and consent."
Delware is a two-party consent state.
"Home cameras used to ensure the safety of a house usually do not come with a sound recorder. Some of the best cameras – such as one of the most outstanding DVR cameras, the DVRDMDC by Streetwise Security – do. To comply with the law, anyone in a two-party-consent state should simply turn off the audio recording option."
On a side note. Some cop arrested a motorcyclist a few years ago and tried to charge him with a bunch of felonies for recording him in public. When that case went to court all charges were dropped except the traffic tickets.
If you are speaking to the case in Maryland, the charges were dropped based on a police officer being a public official and the incident occurring in public. If it hadn't been for those TWO factors, the charges would have stood because Maryland is a two-party consent state.
Tone it down? I don't tone it down for terrorists, be they Middle Eastern, or Americans from that terrorist group, "Pro-Lifers." Don't pretend you don't love pro-lifers that murder physicians. You love the group. Loving the group, means you love the murderers in the group.
Exactly my point, stop calling people like me a terrorist. That's completely ridiculous and if you can't be civil, you will be on ignore and reported. I'm not pretending anything, you really need to stop.
Why do you keep peddling this false information. The audio function in videotaping is also subject to the stringent audio-related regulations in a two-party consent state. Here's a lay-person's explanation for you:
"While 37 U.S. states allow for one-party consent to covert audio recording, twelve states have laws to prevent audio recordings persons without their express knowledge and consent."
Delware is a two-party consent state.
"Home cameras used to ensure the safety of a house usually do not come with a sound recorder. Some of the best cameras – such as one of the most outstanding DVR cameras, the DVRDMDC by Streetwise Security – do. To comply with the law, anyone in a two-party-consent state should simply turn off the audio recording option."
If you are speaking to the case in Maryland, the charges were dropped based on a police officer being a public official and the incident occurring in public. If it hadn't been for those two factors, the charges would have stood because Maryland is a two-party consent state.
And this incident occurred on a public sidewalk and the only audio being recorded was the person's own commentary of what she was filming. There was no secretly recorded conversation.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
