Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Surely you can't believe that woman possesses much intelligence.
She had to possess intelligence in order to debate two well seasoned governors 3 times on economic issues and beat them both to win the governorship of Alaska
And yet, never before in the history of our great nation did that ever cross anyone's mind before now.
Obama is the only President or Presidential candidate in all of US History that has even been asked.
Well maybe this great nation should start doing it In the beginnning, sure, some Pres. didn't even graduate
from college. This is a different time. IMO, simply being age 35 and an American citizen is a rather
loose qualifier. We are a much more educated society than we were in 1812, or 1912.
Obama ran on transparency. Showing his college transcripts should have been/be, the least of his
concerns or worries. If I had voted for him, I would expect nothing less from him.
Kind of reminds me of the reluctance of Ferraro (VP candidate) not wanting to show her husband's
taxes when asked. Complaining, it was just a stereotype of "being Italian".
There was a reason, her husband didn't want to. He was involved
in fraud. Her taxes weren't squeaky clean either.
As an educated voter, I want to know as much info about a candidate before I pull that lever.
IMO, simply being age 35 and an American citizen is a rather
loose qualifier. .
You mean he needs to be a American natural born Citizen rather than citizen. That's what Article 2 Section 1, the presidential clause asks for. There is a difference.
Originally Posted by helenejen
He's your President. That's a fact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper
Really........is that the best you can come up with? Attack me instead of provide the proof I mentioned? That's it? That's all you have?
(Of course it is. Why am I asking, lol. There's a definite pattern.)
Man you're thin skinned, how was that an attack?
Oh, you wanted proof Obama isn't a boy, I see.
Well, Obama is 51 years young, Michelle is 49 years young, their children birth dates:
Malia Ann /məˈliːə/, born on July 4, 1998, and Natasha (known as Sasha /ˈsɑːʃə/), born on June 10, 2001.
I didn't know "BOYS" raised families.
So, you referring to President Obama as BOY must mean you are being derogatory, by using this BOY word as a racial slur.
BOY: Originated during slavery. Used to belittle blacks.
We don't like scary any kind of dudes, and yes, Obama is scary. We do like Dr. Ben Carson, a brilliant Conservative neurosurgeon. How do you explain that?
O' Riley's comments were not about where Obama was born. Rather, he questioned if Obama had been the beneficiary of affirmative action as it relates to college admissions.
O'Riley's position before the birth certificate was released:
And if good ol' Billy 'O can somehow connect this to child molestation and immigration he'll hit a rating trifecta. I've got it! We've got to have Jessica's law expanded to include full college disclosure and handwriting analysis of all birth certificates. Maybe he can send Jessie Waters to Obama's college to ambush and threaten them with a visit from "Bill" himself.
What a ratings wh**e.
Well maybe this great nation should start doing it In the beginnning, sure, some Pres. didn't even graduate
from college. This is a different time. IMO, simply being age 35 and an American citizen is a rather
loose qualifier. We are a much more educated society than we were in 1812, or 1912.
Obama ran on transparency. Showing his college transcripts should have been/be, the least of his
concerns or worries. If I had voted for him, I would expect nothing less from him.
Kind of reminds me of the reluctance of Ferraro (VP candidate) not wanting to show her husband's
taxes when asked. Complaining, it was just a stereotype of "being Italian".
There was a reason, her husband didn't want to. He was involved
in fraud. Her taxes weren't squeaky clean either.
As an educated voter, I want to know as much info about a candidate before I pull that lever.
She had to possess intelligence in order to debate two well seasoned governors 3 times on economic issues and beat them both to win the governorship of Alaska
You keep bringing that up, as if it "proves" something. It has been explained, by people who were residents of Alaska at the time, that her opponent was corrupt, and she just memorized some talking points, something that would have served her well when she interviewed with Katie Couric.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pollyrobin
I have. And, I hope more potential voters of a candidate would just ask themselves.
I'm not sure what you're getting at. We all believed that buffoon Reagan, when he SAID he was a graduate of Eureka College in Illinois. We believed Sarah, when she said she had a degree from the University of Idaho. We've believed every one of the candidates until now. What's the difference? Why can't we believe Obama. YOU tell ME.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.