Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-02-2013, 10:27 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,271,474 times
Reputation: 11416

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHurricaneKid View Post
Well, I'd assume with sexual education there will be a lower birth rate, in turn resulting in less people on welfare...

...Right?
That's how they successfully did it in Scandinavia.

 
Old 04-02-2013, 10:32 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,271,474 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Torpedos View Post
michael jackson said it best. reading, writing, arithmatic are the branches of a learning tree.

until all the parents unite and refuse to send their kids to school, nothing will change. i mean a massive rebellion against the school system. nobody going to school until the school teach kids to read and write. but, parents dont care, this is only going to get worse. so why even bother. the school system is the worse.
Doesn't seem like the educational system did a knock-off job with you.
See: sentence structure, capitalization and spelling.

Last edited by chielgirl; 04-02-2013 at 10:41 AM..
 
Old 04-02-2013, 10:40 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,271,474 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by katygirl68 View Post
Fine, then the parents should teach their children, not the school. Kindergarten is too young for having teachers telling kids this kind of stuff. How would they do it, separate them by sex? Otherwise it's going to cause lots of embarrassment. And are they going to start confusing the kids with their BS about "gender identity," telling them it's perfectly normal to feel like you're a little girl trapped in a boy's body, or that boys wearing dresses or leggings is perfectly fine?

They're already mandating separate bathrooms/locker rooms for kids with gender identity issues in Massachusetts. Is that really a problem worth spending hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars retrofitting schools to accommodate these kids? Are there that many kids identifying as another gender? If so, something's very wrong with their parents.
Parents don't do their job.
 
Old 04-02-2013, 10:45 AM
 
977 posts, read 763,187 times
Reputation: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by kshe95girl View Post
The rules of debate seem to be a foreign concept for some.
Common sense seems to be a foreign concept also. If someone cannot discern the difference between identifying the parts of the body and how to use them, that person is on the wrong forum. Wouldn't you agree?
 
Old 04-02-2013, 10:59 AM
 
Location: Central Maine
2,865 posts, read 3,629,314 times
Reputation: 4019
Oh no! children will learn the proper names for body parts. It will be the downfall of this country!
My son knew the correct names for all of his body parts before kindergarten. What's the big deal?


The "big deal" is why do they need to know "more sophisticated uses of their genitals" at kindergarden age? Why do they need to know about reproduction (I assume human) at kindergarden age? I am okay with the general human anatomy part but why the hurry to get children sexualized?
 
Old 04-02-2013, 11:01 AM
 
977 posts, read 763,187 times
Reputation: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
Parents don't do their job.
According to who? You?
 
Old 04-02-2013, 11:02 AM
 
977 posts, read 763,187 times
Reputation: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by kshe95girl View Post
Learning the proper names for body parts is vile?
Please.
That would be a class in anatomy lefty. Not sex ed. Try to keep up.
 
Old 04-02-2013, 11:05 AM
 
977 posts, read 763,187 times
Reputation: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by kshe95girl View Post
Thats not gonna happen.....
You're delusional. Only some type of predator would want to teach a 5 YO about sex.
 
Old 04-02-2013, 11:08 AM
 
977 posts, read 763,187 times
Reputation: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by kshe95girl View Post
3 out of 4 conservatives prefer pictures, they're easier to understand.
No need to dodge the point lefty. I've been on many political forums in 15 years. Libs are debunked easily and often by the right. In short order, as you have shown, they exhaust themselves of a cogent argument and head for the crayons. Your handlers should prepare you better. You're out of your league.
 
Old 04-02-2013, 11:10 AM
 
977 posts, read 763,187 times
Reputation: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by kshe95girl View Post
I dont think YOU have the vaguest clue what sex ed is, and that sex ed is NOT teaching the Kamasutra.
At least I know how to use punctuation correctly.
Might wanna look into that.
So you know the curricula that the CPS is proposing to teach? Really? Got a link? Or are you assuming facts not in evidence?

Last edited by CaseyB; 04-02-2013 at 11:51 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top