Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, for your answer, I might suggest you look at how libs defend 0bama's 'military' experience when it's pointed out he has none. They get all het up about it.
I'm well aware that different states have different laws. So the basis for your saying that "public urination" makes you a sex offender is Colorado law. In Colorado you have to register for that "crime." Not true in Florida for sure.
You originally said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by FancyFeast5000
In WHAT state has this happened that you are aware of.... I don't think that is the law in California, or anywhere else. There is a very specific set of criteria regarding being classified as a sex offender and having to register as a sex offender....set out in the laws.
I was simply pointing out that your assumption was wrong and that public urination can land you on a sex registry. Somebody still has to catch you though.
Spoiler
"A report by Sarah Tofte of Human Rights Watch, a pressure group, found that at least five states required men to register if they were caught visiting prostitutes. At least 13 required it for urinating in public (in two of which, only if a child was present). No fewer than 29 states required registration for teenagers who had consensual sex with another teenager. And 32 states registered flashers and streakers."
His 'military' experience as CiC has been pointed out by libs here several times. It's one of many sorry excuses libs come up with every now and then.
Just because you haven't seen it doesn't make you good at discussion.
Just because you make the "claim" with no proof does not make it true. Clearly, you didn't understand that our Presidents are all CIVILIAN Commanders in Chief and why.
ROTFLOL! Well, now I've given you a hint, you can pursue other sources. Or are you saying that the military is not subject to the power of our Civilian Commander In Chief?
Both of those departments are run by Chuck hagel and John Kerry, respectively. I don't trust either one of them, currently.
According to a New York state court:
"The President does not enlist in, and he is not inducted or drafted into, the armed forces. Nor, is he subject to court-martial or other military discipline. On the contrary, Article II, section 4 of the Constitution provides that ‘The President, [Vice President] and All Civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of Treason, Bribery or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.’ . . . The last two War Presidents, President Wilson and President Roosevelt, both clearly recognized the civilian nature of the President’s position as Commander in Chief. President Roosevelt, in his Navy Day Campaign speech at Shibe Park, Philadelphia, on October 27, 1944, pronounced this principle as follows:–‘It was due to no accident and no oversight that the framers of our Constitution put the command of our armed forces under civilian authority. It is the duty of the Commander in Chief to appoint the Secretaries of War and Navy and the Chiefs of Staff.’"
ROTFLOL! Well, now I've given you a hint, you can pursue other sources. Or are you saying that the military is not subject to the power of our Civilian Commander In Chief?
Yes and no. I, as a reference librarian, do not consider Wikipedia to be a reliable ACADEMIC source - but for some things it works fine, particularly if they properly and accurately cite their primary sources (which is easy to check). I admit to using them sometimes for reference questions, mostly to get basic biographical info on an individual, or to check the order of a literary series. For some reason, they seem to be the best source for the latter.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I don't think that is the law in California, or anywhere else. There is a very specific set of criteria regarding being classified as a sex offender and having to register as a sex offender....set out in the laws.
