Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But can I take that to mean you don't know? For the record, I wasn't saying that people on Internet forums know nothing - obviously not, or I'd be saying that I know nothing either. I was merely saying that my judgments aren't based solely on "what libs/cons supposedly said or didn't say." That isn't even a statement, it's just a baseless retort.
If you served in the military, or have done some actual research on this topic, I would gladly accept your explanation. Guess I'll have to do that research myself!
It's a crime for soldiers. Bubba was CiC (boss of soldiers).
The President is the CIVILIAN Commander In Chief. You didn't know that, obviously, or why the President, any President, is considered a CIVILIAN CIC. lol
Great, keep running around the question with childish "come backs."
Gizmo and I seem to be the only ones here who can argue like adults I guess.
Lawd knows I try! Sometimes I manage to break through, but usually it just ends up going in a childish circle... not sure why I bother with this forum anymore, ya know? We must be gluttons for punishment, lol.
But still they have to be convicted. That is like saying everyone who has driven drunk should be have a felony convivtion after the first tiem ebcause its a felny o second offense. Pure non-sense as stated earlier.Heck Keerry in his vitnam testomony said that american troops were a bunch of murders and rapist;so do you suggest we take his word or g by innonnent until charged and proven guilty.
Lawd knows I try! Sometimes I manage to break through, but usually it just ends up going in a childish circle... not sure why I bother with this forum anymore, ya know? We must be gluttons for punishment, lol.
I guess so, haha.
The only thing you get from most of these CD'ers is straight up, GOP-sponsored rhetoric for the most part. There are a few (and I stress a few) sane ones here, but overall this board seems to attract the extreme ones who can't hold their own in a real discussion.
Too many people here are missing the point of the thread.
I never once said that Clinton was guilty of anything. That is why I was careful to use the words "should" and "alleged". Many people here have derailed the thread. The purpose was to initiate a discussion on these alleged actions. We should be debating the merits behind the accusations, rather than just saying the obvious - that he has not been convicted.
Some people are taking the thread way too personally.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
