Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-04-2013, 12:24 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,203,370 times
Reputation: 9895

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
HEY Pelosi Junior
Read the article that YOU linked before you comment please.

"This case is not about sexual orientation, but using current law to protect a 17 year-old girl from a 47 year-old sexual predator,"
The attorney general is committed to protecting Virginia's children from predators who attempt to exploit them and rob them of their childhood."

Only someone with a twisted agenda would miss this. A very short article and you couldn't handle it?

it's clear that Cuccinelli's position here has absolutely nothing to do with consenting adults or gay rights. It's about a case involving a man pushing 50 and a high school-aged girl. Oh, and the Attorney General's office is siding with an Obama appointee's ruling on the matter.

No, Ken Cuccinelli's Sodomy Law Petition Doesn't Have Anything to do with Gay Rights - Guy Benson
Then why doesn't he try to get the statutory rape penalties changed from a misdemeanor to a felony? The woman was under the age of consent for Virginia. That would be helping, and not adding a law that could be used against consenting adults.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-04-2013, 12:27 PM
 
Location: Montgomery Village
4,112 posts, read 4,473,842 times
Reputation: 1712
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
HEY Pelosi Junior
Read the article that YOU linked before you comment please.

"This case is not about sexual orientation, but using current law to protect a 17 year-old girl from a 47 year-old sexual predator,"
The attorney general is committed to protecting Virginia's children from predators who attempt to exploit them and rob them of their childhood."

Only someone with a twisted agenda would miss this. A very short article and you couldn't handle it?

it's clear that Cuccinelli's position here has absolutely nothing to do with consenting adults or gay rights. It's about a case involving a man pushing 50 and a high school-aged girl. Oh, and the Attorney General's office is siding with an Obama appointee's ruling on the matter.

No, Ken Cuccinelli's Sodomy Law Petition Doesn't Have Anything to do with Gay Rights - Guy Benson
Can someone explain to me why they can't just charge the perp for statutory rape? the age of consent in VA is 18 right? How would making sodomy illegal help?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2013, 12:27 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,870,989 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
HEY Pelosi Junior
Read the article that YOU linked before you comment please.

"This case is not about sexual orientation, but using current law to protect a 17 year-old girl from a 47 year-old sexual predator,"
The attorney general is committed to protecting Virginia's children from predators who attempt to exploit them and rob them of their childhood."

Only someone with a twisted agenda would miss this. A very short article and you couldn't handle it?

it's clear that Cuccinelli's position here has absolutely nothing to do with consenting adults or gay rights. It's about a case involving a man pushing 50 and a high school-aged girl. Oh, and the Attorney General's office is siding with an Obama appointee's ruling on the matter.

No, Ken Cuccinelli's Sodomy Law Petition Doesn't Have Anything to do with Gay Rights - Guy Benson
Perhaps you can ask Guy Benson to explain why Cuccinelli isn't relying on the new law that outlaws sodomy between an adult and minors. If his goal is to protect minors from adult sexual predators, doesn't that law meet his goals?

From a link in the OP's article:

"The case involves a man who solicited oral sex from a minor and Cuccinelli's office claims that the Supreme Court decision does not apply to cases involving minors. The majority opinion by the 4th Circuit panel stated that a new law outlawing sodomy between an adult and a minor would likely be constitutional. "
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2013, 12:33 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,476,501 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
"This case is not about sexual orientation, but using current law to protect a 17 year-old girl from a 47 year-old sexual predator,"
The attorney general is committed to protecting Virginia's children from predators who attempt to exploit them and rob them of their childhood."
Show me a politician of either party blubbering about how he or she is doing it all "for the children" and I'll show you a politician who wants to shred what's left of the Constitution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2013, 12:38 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,859,151 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardA View Post
To the gays it's all about them.
well they are special. We even have special laws for them. They are such special people that if they get attacked the penalty is worse for their attacker. Why they are so special, marriage isn't good enough for them so we need another name for it. Special can be confusing at times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2013, 12:46 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,859,151 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques View Post
Show me a politician of either party blubbering about how he or she is doing it all "for the children" and I'll show you a politician who wants to shred what's left of the Constitution.
Like the guy who said
"This is our first task — caring for our children. It's our first job. If we don't get that right, we don't get anything right. That's how, as a society, we will be judged."
even though his drones have killed 175 Pakistani children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2013, 12:50 PM
 
46,946 posts, read 25,979,166 times
Reputation: 29440
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
[i]it's clear that Cuccinelli's position here has absolutely nothing to do with consenting adults or gay rights. It's about a case involving a man pushing 50 and a high school-aged girl.
If an AG can't nail that creep without invoking a previously overturned law, he needs to find another profession. Or Virginia can get with the program and update their laws to something resembling 20th-century standards.

Well, I guess he's trying to get another job, so there is that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2013, 12:50 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,859,151 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by btsilver View Post
Can someone explain to me why they can't just charge the perp for statutory rape? the age of consent in VA is 18 right? How would making sodomy illegal help?
You would think. Two charges for the price of one maybe?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2013, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,859,151 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Perhaps you can ask Guy Benson to explain why Cuccinelli isn't relying on the new law that outlaws sodomy between an adult and minors. If his goal is to protect minors from adult sexual predators, doesn't that law meet his goals?

From a link in the OP's article:

"The case involves a man who solicited oral sex from a minor and Cuccinelli's office claims that the Supreme Court decision does not apply to cases involving minors. The majority opinion by the 4th Circuit panel stated that a new law outlawing sodomy between an adult and a minor would likely be constitutional. "
I believe he is saying that creating a new law would do that. Not that there already is a law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-04-2013, 12:53 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,476,501 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
You would think. Two charges for the price of one maybe?
What's the point?

The age of consent should certainly be no more than 16 in the first place, but that's another argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top