Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Actually any form of growth is considered growth. That is the definition of the word after all.
Not exactly, when that .2% growth, (or whats really projected which is 1.5%) is off set by a depreciating value of the dollar in the 3-4% range, you are at a net loss.
Because things cost more than when you started
Odd how he was able to pass Obamacare without ONE Republican vote, while you guys want to stand there and moan and groan that Obama couldnt get anything passed because Republicans blocked everything.
You guys should be completely embarassed, but its almost like your pround of your ignorance.
That is because this current Congress is actually that bad that no president from either party could lead that group of morons to do anything other than worry about winning more elections.
then put in a rule to have a budget passed or atleast a plan to break the gridlock or if I was president threaten to severely cut back all salary and benefits of all senators and congressmen on both sides and have massive layoffs and budget cuts and make senior staff members fly coach on a discount airline and a cheap hotel heck try to make them catch flights with the Canadian government on our Government owned Challenger private planes to international events to sign some trade deal or speech outside of North America
split the cost of fuel for the flight we can use an old C-130 military cargo plane since a new 787 is expensive then pay every politician a max of $50K a year and lead refusing to be paid as president during bad economic times.
Obama himself said that increase the national debt was irresponsible.. So yes, I'd say that we should take him at his word and filibuster the debt jut to make him happy.
Yeah, it really something to filibuster your own bill, LOL.
If its working, then why do we have record unemployment, and so many people losing the job market, with only a 1.5% expected growth in the economy?
Supposedly the Fed is now basing monetary policy or "all the tools in their arsenal" to reduce unemployment. I don't think people were expecting it to be reduced by masses of people forced into early retirement or living with their parents until age 40.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
