U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-08-2013, 07:14 AM
 
315 posts, read 182,956 times
Reputation: 135

Advertisements

Don't filibuster the back ground check. The left will just use it to beat you over the head. Instead attach things like Exemptions for guns given or sold to family members or friends of more than 2 years that you know are not felons. Make the Gov. pay for all BGCs with a shall not charge clause that states that upon demand any police/sheriff dept. must at not charge to the buyer or seller do a BGC for a gun transaction.

Couple this with a clause that states that if any police / sheriff dept denies such BGC that the buyer and seller are free to do the sale with no repercussions to the seller of any legal sale.

Also maybe some sun down clause that says that a study after 10 years must be done at the expense of the federal government and if it does not show more than what ever percent of crime stopped then the laws sunsets.

This way its not killed outright but it does not burden the gun owner who wants to give a gun to their wife husband, son or daughter, ect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-08-2013, 07:18 AM
 
Location: Long Island
29,392 posts, read 12,296,817 times
Reputation: 6071
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharkhunter View Post
Don't filibuster the back ground check. The left will just use it to beat you over the head. Instead attach things like Exemptions for guns given or sold to family members or friends of more than 2 years that you know are not felons. Make the Gov. pay for all BGCs with a shall not charge clause that states that upon demand any police/sheriff dept. must at not charge to the buyer or seller do a BGC for a gun transaction.

Couple this with a clause that states that if any police / sheriff dept denies such BGC that the buyer and seller are free to do the sale with no repercussions to the seller of any legal sale.

Also maybe some sun down clause that says that a study after 10 years must be done at the expense of the federal government and if it does not show more than what ever percent of crime stopped then the laws sunsets.

This way its not killed outright but it does not burden the gun owner who wants to give a gun to their wife husband, son or daughter, ect.
The background check might make it through the senate, not sure what the point of fillibustering would be on this issue, yes it would work against them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:57 AM.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top