Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This radio show is hosted by a Twin Cities conservative talk host and former Minnesota legislator and governor candidate Tom Emmer, who lost in a narrow governor election a couple of years ago to current governor Mark Dayton.
Quote:
Twin Cities radio talk-show host Bob Davis has lost an advertiser and is being offered an all-expenses-paid trip to Newtown, Conn., to repeat what he said on the air recently: that the families who lost loved ones in the Sandy Hook school shooting can “go to hell” for taking a visible role in the national debate on gun control.
The criticism of the conservative co-host of the “Davis and Emmer” show on KTCN (AM 1130) centers on this perspective from Davis on April 12:
“I have something I want to say to the victims of Newtown or any other shooting, I don’t care if it’s here in Minneapolis or anyplace else: Just because a bad thing happened to you doesn’t mean that you get to put a king in charge of my life. I’m sorry that you suffered a tragedy, but you know what? Deal with it, and don’t force me to lose my liberty, which is a greater tragedy than your loss.
“I’m sick and tired of seeing these victims trotted out, given rides on Air Force One, hauled into the Senate well, and everyone is … terrified of these victims. I would stand in front of them and tell them, ‘Go to hell.’ ”
Acknowledging that his comments angered some people, Davis explained himself on his next show, three days later. He said he understands that families of the victims of the elementary school shooting in December would want to “dedicate their lives to the memory of their children.”
Davis said, “I do not hide behind flowery language. I do not pull my punches.”
Another four days later, Davis told listeners that he “made an inappropriate comment” and “did not mean to criticize the families of the victims. … I want to offer my most sincere and total apology to all the families for any further pain those words may have caused.”
Gregg Swedberg, an executive with KTCN’s parent company, Clear Channel, declined to say Monday whether Davis was disciplined. Davis has not missed a show.
Over the weekend in a commentary posted on www.startribune.com, Brad Greene of Sandy Hook, Conn., said he sent Davis an e-mail “offering to pay his travel expenses to Newtown to stand in front of people and repeat the words he said on the radio. It is no surprise that he has not responded to my offer.”
Greene wrote, “it is disgraceful that Davis would use his platform in such a divisive manner. I feel strongly that words matter and that Davis’ comments are an embarrassment to the good city of Minneapolis.”
As of Monday afternoon, Greene said, Davis has yet to respond to his offer.
Late last week, “Davis and Emmer” sponsor Atomic Data said it was immediately and permanently pulling its advertising in light of Davis’ comments. A statement from the company said, “We don’t believe, as Bob Davis seems to, that being mean and resentful is a ‘liberty.’ It’s disrespectful, and, in Bob’s case, it crossed the line of civility.”
Davis shares the time slot with former Republican gubernatorial candidate Tom Emmer.
Scott Evangelist, marketing manager for Atomic Data, a Minneapolis-based information technology support company, said Monday that “the tone, content, and politics of the Davis and Emmer show has changed greatly since we first signed on with them.”
Swedberg said that Atomic Data is the only advertiser to pull its ads from the show.
An utterance? He went on a completely foul disrespectful rant.
He's a radio TALK show host; he should be expected to speak at length about stuff. Also, a great many people agree with the gist of his rant if not all of his delivery of it.
Speak publicly long enough and sure as shyte you'll say something you regret. Any married man can verify this.
Telling them to "go to hell" is a bit rude, but I agree with the sentiment. Frankly, the Newtown families have become a nuisance, almost as much as those 9/11 families. They have suffered a grave loss, but that does not entitle them to special privileges, nor does it give them added expertise on the issue, nor does their loss justify violating the liberties of innocent people. What some of these families are trying to do is manipulate people towards a political end while using the natural emotion of respect for the dead and their families as a shield against any criticism; that is something that shouldn't be tolerated or encouraged. Their process of mourning and grief should be respected, but neither should they get a free pass on advancing a political agenda.
Telling them to "go to hell" is a bit rude, but I agree with the sentiment. Frankly, the Newtown families have become a nuisance, almost as much as those 9/11 families. They have suffered a grave loss, but that does not entitle them to special privileges, nor does it give them added expertise on the issue, nor does their loss justify violating the liberties of innocent people. What some of these families are trying to do is manipulate people towards a political end while using the natural emotion of respect for the dead and their families as a shield against any criticism; that is something that shouldn't be tolerated or encouraged. Their process of mourning and grief should be respected, but neither should they get a free pass on advancing a political agenda.
Telling them to "go to hell" is a bit rude, but I agree with the sentiment. Frankly, the Newtown families have become a nuisance, almost as much as those 9/11 families. They have suffered a grave loss, but that does not entitle them to special privileges, nor does it give them added expertise on the issue, nor does their loss justify violating the liberties of innocent people. What some of these families are trying to do is manipulate people towards a political end while using the natural emotion of respect for the dead and their families as a shield against any criticism; that is something that shouldn't be tolerated or encouraged. Their process of mourning and grief should be respected, but neither should they get a free pass on advancing a political agenda.
Let ask ourselves this question, do they even realize what they are doing or are they just being exploited by politicians?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
