Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The left put up baby photos of Martin so it would seem he was shot out of his baby walker. Instead of the 6 foot thug he was. Now the press is showing the photo of the poor little boy who was mislead by his brother. About 13 and big eyes, how could we believe that he did this? I bet the government photo shopped him driving over his brother killing him.
Its an old trick and very deceitful. But its what is expected from the left wing.
i cant really link the 2 events in my mind at all.
but i think public sympathy is manipulated in pretty much any non military court case.
my sympathy lies not with the bombers but with the real babies they murdered.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 23 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,552 posts, read 16,542,682 times
Reputation: 6039
Quote:
Originally Posted by putlocker
The left put up baby photos of Martin so it would seem he was shot out of his baby walker. Instead of the 6 foot thug he was. Now the press is showing the photo of the poor little boy who was mislead by his brother. About 13 and big eyes, how could we believe that he did this? I bet the government photo shopped him driving over his brother killing him.
Its an old trick and very deceitful. But its what is expected from the left wing.
So what defines Trayvon Martin to be a thug, the fact that he fought for his life while someone with a gun confronted him or the fact that his weapon of choice was a can of Ice tea ?
As for this kid, The government has a better case against his brother based on his travels. It makes sense to claim that he is where he learned it from, does it not ?
Your own interpretation is that they are talking about that to place blame solely on the dead brother. Thats your opinion and not something spoken out of the mouths of liberals in the media or in print.
Now the press is showing the photo of the poor little boy who was mislead by his brother. About 13 and big eyes, how could we believe that he did this? I bet the government photo shopped him driving over his brother killing him.
While my daily perusal of commie websites (Slate, Salon, TMP and Huff Post) hasn't turned up the baby pictures of the Brothers Tsarnaev is it really that surprising the the news media are eager to provide the public with any information that will help them understand how an apparently decent kid turned into another in a long line of sociopaths?
He's 19. Do you want them to put up a picture of him where he's 37? How would that work?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
