Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Bwhaaaa, ha, ha, ha, ha... you gotta luv the easily led...
Perhaps that is "the pot calling the kettle black", Bob.
Now why would anyone, with an ounce of common sense, not want to know exactly what went on?
1. Should we ignore the whistle blowers and the witnesses, simply because they refute the White House version of the story?
2. If men died, and did not need to die, should we not ask why?
3. Should we not ask why the White House perpetuated a story they knew was false?
4. Why have there been several versions of the same event coming from the White House?
5. What did the president know and when?
6. If a republican was in the White House, would you be responding the same way? (obviously not).
If you do not want to answer any of these questions, perhaps you are simply a partisan, knee-jerk Obama supporter who is "easily led" and does not respect the rule of law.
You should read your own link. You would learn something.
As to the link I posted regarding funding not being an issue, the statement by Charlene Lamb was taken from a report. That is the only point of that link. There is a transcript of the first oversight committee hearing. Do a search and locate the Q&A of Charlene Lamb.
I say let the GOP talk. Let all the GOP pundits talk also.
Let the truth hurt the GOP once again. It's almost as if they seem to enjoy the pain.
You are so convinced that no amount of evidence would convince you otherwise. When an American citizen is accused of a crime this is exactly why they want a jury that is not familiar with the crime and don't have assumptions prior to the hearing.
True American patriots were left to die for politics. Obama and Hillary Clinton lied (Hillary under oath) and purposely manipulated/altered/removed evidence. Other patriots pray this is the end for this treasonous Obama administration and all those people complicit in this obvious cover-up. Richard Nixon, who had enough honor and respect, left for the country to resign; Obama will need to be dragged out kicking and screaming with wife Michelle hanging on to the Whitehouse steps, claws fully extended.
What is the most disgusting and disturbing element of this whole thing is that Obama went to bed after hearing of the attack so he could be rested for his fund-raising trip the next day! Once again, he has proven that he is not a leader!
Obama should be asked to step-down, and impeachment proceedings started. Hillary Clinton should be arrested and imprisoned for lying under oath to Congress and charged with manslaughter at minimum. Both are scumbags and are destroying our citizens and our country. They can both go to hell...
It's also a practice of Obama's to have his staff and admin officials say the things he refuses to admit to, and then claim he never said or did them.
for example.
One minute Obama infers the attack on Benghazi was a terror attack, and infers the video was the cause, and the next minute his own spokeswoman goes on the Sunday shows to state the attack was only a spontaneous protest over a "disgusting" YouTube video, and was not a terrorist attack.
One minute Obama claims the sequester was something the republican congress proposed, and the next minute his staff, and his own spokesman admits the sequester was Obama's idea.
If we were to think like these Obama sycophants, then the president and his admin are completely separate entities and neither one is aligned with or controlling the other.
Obama would have us believe that he is the president of the planet Mars, and has nothing to do with the daily activities on planet earth. The president from Mars is stunned and amazed, on a daily basis, about the goings on within our federal government on earth, and he wonders who the hell is in charge of the executive branch down here.
Your first link is nothing more than a right wing blogger site.
The second remark that "it was the size of the attack, not the money," is double talk.
We have established that there was no consulate in Benghazi. Did the GOP House approve funding for security in high risk countries at non embassy or consulate sites? Would a covert CIA house continue to be "covert" if there were military guards around it?
BTW, can the right-wingers here debate an issue using logic instead of resorting to childish personal attacks?
Double talk?
Who is "we"? Has it been revealed that it was a covert CIA house?? Where do you get your information? Did the administration admit this?
There was no personal attack, I guess you just take everything personal when it doesn't suit you. That's your problem.
You know what is childish - or maybe ignorant? When someone ASSumes that someone is somethiing that they are not and has to use name calling to do it. When someone thinks a debate is when others agree with them. When someone thinks they are using logic, when its nothing but babble.
Last edited by softblueyz; 05-08-2013 at 10:16 AM..
Watching Mr Cummings talk. He isn't there to hear facts, he is playing defense attorney and telling everyone that nothing you are going to hear is the truth because we have already made up our mind. That fool needs to be slapped down..!
Of course not. To admit terrorist attack a few weeks before the election would ruin his record of "no terrorist attacks on my watch".
And to think..the President of the US stood there apologizing for a video made in the US, disclaiming US sentiment towards Islam and never once mentioned terrorist attack.
Yeah..the party above all else.
Yet you and other easily manipulated, continue to repeat the lies about what Obama/Clinton said.... strange that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.