Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-07-2013, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
7,605 posts, read 4,844,821 times
Reputation: 1438

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by chronic65 View Post
I won't call you a brainwashed fool, but, the truth is you resemble one. Obama knew full well that a stupid video had nothing to do with Benghazi when he went to the UN and made that foolish unamerican speech.
Obama in his U.N. speech did not claim that Benghazi was because of a video.

 
Old 05-07-2013, 01:11 PM
 
2,345 posts, read 1,670,247 times
Reputation: 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
“The world is safer,” Mr. Obama said as he appeared at a White House ceremony bestowing the Medal of Honor to two soldiers killed in the Korean War. “It is a better place because of the death of Osama bin Laden.”

Or at least that is what Obama wanted us to believe. Obviously they could not increase security because that would contradict what Obama was shouting to the roof tops during the campaign.

The house is holding new hearsing on the Benghazi attack. They will hear new information on a cover up. This goes straight to the top, Obama and then Hillary Clinton who testified that she had no part in it. Testifying before congress, she claimed she did not approve them, didn't deny them. She claims ignorance, A cable with her signature that denies additional security and orders the withdrawal.

House GOP Benghazi report says Clinton signed off on security reduction – CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs
Benghazi Whistleblower: “You should have seen what (Clinton) tried to do to us that night!”

Read more: Benghazi Whistleblower:
Benghazi Whistleblower: “You should have seen what (Clinton) tried to do to us that night!”

Read more: Benghazi Whistleblower:
 
Old 05-07-2013, 01:13 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,005,925 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Keep trying.

You guys just can't get it in your thick skulls that Benghazi ain't gonna do what the election couldn't do for you guys.

There isn't gonna be an impeachment or a single resignation although you wingers should resign yourselves to the idea that this Benghazi thing is fruitless on your part and will remain so.
4 people lost their lives and liberals don't care.

Oh, that is right, they died in a fire.

Liberals only care if someone dies because of a gunshot wound, unless the shooting takes place in Chicago - then they don't want to talk about it.

It doesn't help their agenda.
 
Old 05-07-2013, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,005,925 times
Reputation: 6128
What did the president know and when did he know it?
 
Old 05-07-2013, 01:16 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,971 posts, read 22,147,086 times
Reputation: 13800
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
He didn't "lie" for two weeks. There was supposition in the days immediately following, and if people are honest, they would take it for what it was - supposition.
Even Ms Rice's statements were bracketed by "what we know at present" and were in no way definitive.
Of course, I am not a binary thinker so, I understand that "what we know at present" indicates a certain fluidity and is not an absolute statement of fact.

As we've seen over and over and over again in the recent past, every time something tragic occurs, for whatever reason, people seem to believe that the whys and wherefores have to be immediately evident when of course they are not.
Unfortunately this need to know, no, this claimed "right" to know produces the sort of idiocy we've seen after this event, after Boston, after Newton and so on. If the "truth" is not evident within the first 24 hours than what comes after simply cannot be the truth in some people's tiny brains.


The president labeled the events a terror attack the day after the tragedy. That is what it was.
If that is a lie in your mind, then so be it. I think that says more about you than it does about the truth of the situation.

UPDATED: What Everyone Should Know About The Benghazi Attack | ThinkProgress
Was that before or after 0bama turned his back on Stevens and went to bed on the night of Sept 11th, not caring if Stevens and the staff were alive or dead?

Then again, 0bama did have a long difficult flight to Las Vegas the next day, and needed to prepared for his campaign speech, so I guess that makes it okay.
 
Old 05-07-2013, 01:17 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,971 posts, read 22,147,086 times
Reputation: 13800
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamSmyth View Post
Obama in his U.N. speech did not claim that Benghazi was because of a video.
That was what he instructed his aides and staff to say.
 
Old 05-07-2013, 01:18 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,005,925 times
Reputation: 6128
Benghazi took place on the same day that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev became a U.S. citizen.
 
Old 05-07-2013, 01:19 PM
 
2,345 posts, read 1,670,247 times
Reputation: 779
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/05/be...wzqM_s.twitter

Benghazi whistleblower Mark I. Thompson, a former Marine and now the deputy coordinator for operations in the State Department’s counterterrorism bureau, is expected to level the allegation that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and a key aide effectively tried to cut his department out of the chain of reporting and decision-making. His testimony is set to begin on Wednesday before Chairman Darrell Issa’s House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Read more: Benghazi Whistleblower:
 
Old 05-07-2013, 01:20 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
The administration says Thompson is lying.
 
Old 05-07-2013, 01:20 PM
 
15,047 posts, read 8,871,547 times
Reputation: 9510
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
Was that before or after 0bama turned his back on Stevens and went to bed on the night of Sept 11th, not caring if Stevens and the staff were alive or dead?
You remind me of birthers. No matter how many times your claims are debunked, you continue to post them as if they were the gospel truth. Birthers and Benghazi "truthers" have a lot in common.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top