Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Rossi
All of it. Declining attempts to beef up secuirty, telling potential rescuers to stand down. You don't see it because you refuse to see. It is all but impossible for you to see it.
|
I agree. It is like liberals had the "mute" button on anytime Hicks was talking in the testimony. Liberals will not believe any of it, regardless of the evidence, as they simply cannot accept the fact the administration flat out lied and perpetuated a cover up.
Even if and when Obama is impeached for this, the average lib will not believe it, even after it has happened!
One only has the watch the C-SPAN coverage and the embarrassing behavior of the democrats to understand this.
Here is the big problem for Obama-
Hicks stated he contacted the state department about the attack at its inception
Hicks was told that military assets would be delivered
Hicks was then told that military assets would not be coming
The two forces that were loaded and available were told to stand down AFTER Panetta met with Obama
Only the Commander in Chief could order the forces to stand down
Investigation of the crime scene by the FBI was delayed 18 days, despite Hicks insistence otherwise
Hicks was told not to communicate with investigators via State Department council
Hicks and his associates were demoted two months later, after stellar careers in which they were repeatedly promoted
The commander of Africom, who was ordered to "stand down" was dismissed
It is obvious that Obama was
a. aware at the onset that the attack was a terrorist attack
b. Obama met with Panetta
c. Obama ordered available troops to "stand down"
d. The White House altered the CIA official statement to exclude issues of terrorism
e. The White House excluded any mention of terrorism or Obama/Clinton's names
f. The "video" story was ordered by the White House to distract the American public
g. The cover up was orchestrated to limit any damage to Obama's re-election
This is FAR BIGGER than Watergate. If you are a liberal and stand by Obama on this one, it shows you have no regard for the rule of law and feel as though there are those in office who are above the law. In short, you do not agree with the rule of law for all men in the United States. If so, just say it- "I don't care about the laws of the US and feel as though liberal politicians should be able to break the law when they damn well please!"
This clearly shows that liberals ARE the new fascists- laws do not apply to them, only the "little people".
This is why Nixon HAD TO BE IMPEACHED. Those proceedings showed that NO MAN was above the laws of the US, which is the basis for stability and confidence in our system. If Obama is NOT IMPEACHED for this, it demonstrates that we have entered a new phase of degradation in the US, in which the RULE OF LAW is no longer applicable to everyone. That is the prelude to revolution.
No man is more important that the rule of law, or the nation. That is the issue at stake here.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
