Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Actually, as a tree hugger I've been supporting fusion ever since I read about the concept of atomic energy. However I am concerned about the safety of fusion facility, and hopefully nothing goes wrong.
Nuclear fusion - no radioactive waste generated, no run-away nuclear meltdowns, no green-house gasses produced, no toxic dead-zone if/when a fusion plant is decommissioned.
But the "Green Fanatic tree hugging lunatics" will find something to whine about?
No..just the constant gloom and doom the sky is falling rants from the Green lunatics!
if you'd figured them out...What's the problem?
I find it funny when someone gains some nugget of knowledge, and they have to share that newly gained knowledge with everyone else...never taking the time to realize that others may have come to that knowledge long before they.
Great for you...you get a gold star. Now go sit down in your seat and stop eating the paste.
Actually, to defend The Mask, fusion energy in theory is a lot safer than fission, if the structure fails, in terms of radiation release. What I am curious about is structure safety and the potential damage if a structure fails. Because ITER is VERY expensive.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
